MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4413872454 · doi:10.18331/brj2025.12.3.3

Microbial photoproduction of n-heptane

2025· article· en· W4413872454 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Ángel Baca-Porcel, Poutoum Palakiyém Samire, Bertrand Légeret, Pascaline Auroy-Tarrago, Florian Veillet, Cécile Giacalone, Stéphan Cuiné, Solène Moulin, Gilles Peltier, Yonghua Li‐Beisson, Fred Beisson, Damien Sorigué

Bibliographic record

VenueBiofuel Research Journal · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPhotodynamic Therapy Research Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersHORIZON EUROPE Marie Sklodowska-Curie ActionsEuropean Regional Development FundAgence Nationale de la Recherche
KeywordsHeptaneChemistryEnvironmental chemistryOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The photoenzyme fatty acid photodecarboxylase (FAP) has emerged as a promising catalyst for the redox-neutral biological production of hydrocarbons. Previous studies have shown that FAP can efficiently convert medium-chain fatty acids such as n-octanoic acid into hydrocarbons, outperforming its natural long-chain fatty acid substrates (C16-C18). Such observation expands the potential applications of FAP to include solvents and jet fuels. However, the limited availability of natural sources of n-octanoic acid poses a challenge to the industrial implementation of n-heptane bioproduction. This study investigates the hydrocarbon synthesis capacity of an E. coli strain that expresses FAP and produces n-octanoic acid, the precursor to n-heptane, via a specific octanoyl-ACP thioesterase. Several FAPs and thioesterases were tested. A blue light-inducible promoter ensured high expression of both enzymes, eliminating the need for chemical inducers. Fusion of FAP with thioredoxin increased n-heptane production 12-fold. Using a co-cultivation strategy, where one strain produces n-octanoic acid and another strain converts it to n-heptane, increased hydrocarbon production 14-fold compared to co-expressing FAP and thioesterase. Co-cultures operated in batch mode in 100-mL photobioreactors enabled the recovery of >90%-pure n-heptane, yielding 272 mg·L-1 over 56 h. This work lays the foundation for the development of an industrial bioproduction of n-heptane.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.140
Threshold uncertainty score0.503

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.054
GPT teacher head0.430
Teacher spread0.376 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBiofuel Research JournalSame topicPhotodynamic Therapy Research StudiesFrench-language works237,207