MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4413873842 · doi:10.17979/ja-cea.2025.46.12252

YARP Cartesian controller layers over ROS 2 for teleoperation and web applications

2025· article· es· W4413873842 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Bartek Łukawski, María de las Mercedes Rebollo Rayo, Ángel Gilabert de la Encina, Juan G. Victores, Carlos Balaguer, Alberto Jardón

Bibliographic record

VenueJornadas de Automática · 2025
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldEngineering
TopicTeleoperation and Haptic Systems
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersInstituto de Salud Carlos IIIComunidad de MadridCanadian Institute for Advanced Research
KeywordsTeleoperationComputer scienceController (irrigation)Cartesian coordinate systemHuman–computer interactionControl (management)MathematicsArtificial intelligenceBiologyGeometry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Nuestros trabajos previos introdujeron una arquitectura de teleoperación para brazos robóticos orquestada por el entorno de trabajo e intermediario YARP. Un esquema distribuido de componentes software facilitó la adopción de nuevos periféricos para teleoperación, explorando múltiples modos de control. En este trabajo, proponemos un nexo entre los elementos de YARP ya disponibles y el ecosistema de paquetes y herramientas de Robot Operating System (ROS). Nuestro controlador cartesiano y sus interfaces C++ han servido como base para la nueva implementación, exponiendo comandos del robot y su configuración 3D en la red de ROS 2. Esto ha sido materializado en forma de una aplicación de teleoperación para el ratón 3D SpaceMouse de bajo coste, y una aplicación web construida con la librería React en JavaScript. Ambos componentes han sido probados y validados sobre robots reales y en simulación: sobre la plataforma robótica humanoide TEO y el brazo asistencial AMOR.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.019
Threshold uncertainty score0.065

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0190.006

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.249
Teacher spread0.245 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJornadas de AutomáticaSame topicTeleoperation and Haptic SystemsFrench-language works237,207