Zone de libre-échange continentale africaine et développement durable en Afrique
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The African Continental Free Trade Area (AfCFTA) is a great opportunity for Africa. However, in recognition of the positive and negative interactions between trade and the environment, the AfCFTA should be implemented in compliance with environmental standards and sciences, by incorporating environmental protection clauses, setting up institutional mechanisms and adopting certain organisational approaches to ensure effective implementation that is compatible with sustainable development. The avenues for improvement to address the weaknesses of its greening are modelled on the so-called ‘new generation’ of free trade agreements, such as the Agreement between Canada, the United States of America and Mexico, the Comprehensive and Progressive Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement, the Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement with Canada, and to some extent the rules laid down in the World Trade Organisation or its predecessor agreements. The measures advocated in this contribution should necessarily lead to the revision of the Agreement creating the AfCFTA or the adoption of a specific protocol on environmental issues with a view to the advent of ‘green free trade’ on the continent.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it