MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4413878685 · doi:10.1038/s41598-025-15604-6

Explainable self-supervised learning for medical image diagnosis based on DINO V2 model and semantic search

2025· article· en· W4413878685 on OpenAlexaff
Alaa Hussien, Abdelkareem Elkhateb, M. Saeed, Nourhan Mohamed Elsabawy, Alaa Ebraheem Elnakeeb, Nora El-Rashidy

Bibliographic record

VenueScientific Reports · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicRadiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging
Canadian institutionsArtificial Intelligence in Medicine (Canada)
FundersScience and Technology Development Fund
KeywordsInterpretabilityComputer scienceArtificial intelligenceMachine learningMedical imagingSemantic gapWorkflowDeep learningSupervised learningFeature (linguistics)Image (mathematics)Information retrievalImage retrievalArtificial neural networkDatabase

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Medical images have become indispensable for decision-making and significantly affect treatment planning. However, increasing medical imaging has widened the gap between medical images and available radiologists, leading to delays and diagnosis errors. Recent studies highlight the potential of deep learning (DL) in medical image diagnosis. However, their reliance on labelled data limits their applicability in various clinical settings. As a result, recent studies explore the role of self-supervised learning to overcome these challenges. Our study aims to address these challenges by examining the performance of self-supervised learning (SSL) in diverse medical image datasets and comparing it with traditional pre-trained supervised learning models. Unlike prior SSL methods that focus solely on classification, our framework leverages DINOv2's embeddings to enable semantic search in medical databases (via Qdrant), allowing clinicians to retrieve similar cases efficiently. This addresses a critical gap in clinical workflows where rapid case The results affirmed SSL's ability, especially DINO v2, to overcome the challenge associated with labelling data and provide an accurate diagnosis superior to traditional SL. DINO V2 provides 100%, 99%, 99%, 100 and 95% for classification accuracy of Lung cancer, brain tumour, leukaemia and Eye Retina Disease datasets, respectively. While existing SSL models (e.g., BYOL, SimCLR) lack interpretability, we uniquely combine DINOv2 with ViT-CX, a causal explanation method tailored for transformers. This provides clinically actionable heatmaps, revealing how the model localizes tumors/cellular patternsa feature absent in prior SSL medical imaging studies Furthermore, our research explores the impact of semantic search in the medical images domain and how it can revolutionize the querying process and provide semantic results alongside SSL and the Qudra Net dataset utilized to save the embedding of the developed model after the training process. Cosine similarity measures the distance between the image query and stored information in the embedding using cosine similarity. Our study aims to enhance the efficiency and accuracy of medical image analysis, ultimately improving the decision-making process.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.018

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.306
Teacher spread0.294 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueScientific Reports→Same topicRadiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging→French-language works237,207→