Advanced Prediction and Coated Solar Panel Performance Improvement Using Combined Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) Architecture–Autoregressive Moving Average (ARMA) Technique
Bibliographic record
Abstract
As solar energy has become a critical renewable resource, precise forecasting systems for photovoltaic (PV) solar panel power generation are becoming increasingly important. These panels were treated with hydrophobic coatings to increase their effectiveness and efficiency. In response to the increased demand for precise power forecasting, a new smart power prediction system was created specifically for coated PV solar panels. This novel approach used a hybrid model that included autoregressive moving average (ARMA) and long short-term memory (LSTM) approaches to successfully capture both short-term and long-term correlations in efficiency and output data. This method increased forecasting accuracy while addressing the constraints of older methods involving limitations in capturing both short-term and long-term dependencies in solar power generation data, reduced forecasting accuracy, and inefficiencies in feature extraction. Advanced feature extraction techniques, most notably the discrete wavelet transform (DWT), were used to identify important temporal and frequency patterns in solar insolation data. Following thorough testing and validation, the system achieved a very high accuracy of 98.3%, outperforming previous models by 2.3%. The deployment of this system resulted in considerable increases in PV efficiency, allowing for greater grid integration and energy management, ultimately contributing to a more sustainable energy future.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".