MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4413887350 · doi:10.1109/jlt.2025.3604715

Data Center Mode Division Multiplexing at Net 1.6 Tb/s Per Wavelength w/o MIMO Processing

2025· article· en· W4413887350 on OpenAlexaff
Ghazaleh Adibifard, S.K. Pal, Nathalie Bacon, Sophie LaRochelle, Leslie A. Rusch

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Lightwave Technology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSemiconductor Lasers and Optical Devices
Canadian institutionsGenia Photonics (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWavelength-division multiplexingMultiplexingMIMOCenter (category theory)Division (mathematics)OpticsSignal processingPhysicsWavelengthOptical communicationMode (computer interface)TelecommunicationsComputer scienceElectronic engineeringEngineeringMathematicsDigital signal processing

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Space division multiplexing (SDM) is a promising solution to increase the capacity of optical communications within data centers. We focus on mode division multiplexing (MDM) architectures with fibers supporting multiple modes. We show that network hardware is significantly less complex for MDM with orbital angular momentum (OAM) compared to MDM with linearly polarized (LP) modes. The advantage stems from low crosstalk among OAM modes, hence limited digital signal processing (DSP) complexity. Unlike demonstrations of MDM with LP, our demonstrations have no multiple-input multiple-output (MIMO) processing. We transmit 16 OAM channels at 56 Gbaud quadrature phase-shift keying (QPSK) over 400 m (distance sufficient for links within data centers). The net throughput of 1.6 Tbit/s per wavelength is the highest reported OAM-MDM throughput, even among demonstrations with much greater DSP complexity. We can span the entire C-band, with throughput of 1.3 Tbit/s at the band edges. To reduce latency and power consumption, 8-channel transmission can achieve a net throughput of 0.8 Tbit/s per wavelength across the C-band with wide margin. The OAM MDM approach can flexibly trade-off throughput, latency, and complexity.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.023

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.276
Teacher spread0.258 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Lightwave TechnologySame topicSemiconductor Lasers and Optical DevicesFrench-language works237,207