MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4413887628 · doi:10.1007/s44290-025-00308-7

Vibration-based energy harvesting in large-scale civil infrastructure: a comprehensive outlook of current technologies and future prospects

2025· article· en· W4413887628 on OpenAlexaff
Hooman Kargar Gazkooh, Ayan Sadhu, Kefu Liu

Bibliographic record

VenueDiscover Civil Engineering · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicInnovative Energy Harvesting Technologies
Canadian institutionsLakehead UniversityWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCurrent (fluid)Civil infrastructureScale (ratio)Energy harvestingEnergy (signal processing)VibrationCivil engineeringEngineeringEnvironmental scienceArchitectural engineeringConstruction engineeringComputer scienceSystems engineeringElectrical engineeringPhysicsAcousticsGeographyCartography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Vibration-based energy harvesting (VEH) is a highly sought-after technology that attracts tremendous attention in various engineering applications to meet energy demands. Researchers have published numerous papers discussing various VEH devices utilizing different scavenging methodologies. However, a detailed and comprehensive insight into how this technology could be used in diverse large-scale smart civil infrastructure is lacking. To meet this need, this paper comprehensively reviews VEH techniques in the last decade within civil infrastructure, a critical domain for generating clean, sustainable energy. The review evaluates the deployment of VEH across a diverse range of large-scale infrastructure that consistently encounters vibrations, such as bridges, buildings, wind turbines, railways, tunnels, roads, and pavements. The literature is systematically classified into thematic case studies, employing diverse VEH methodologies, including piezoelectric (PE), electromagnetic (EM), and triboelectric (TE) transduction approaches. This review focuses explicitly on single energy harvesting (EH), where only one energy source and one transduction mechanism are used and does not include hybrid EH mechanisms. This review distinguishes itself by examining a broad spectrum of civil infrastructure, thus highlighting its novelty and expanding beyond previous reviews that focused on a single infrastructure type. Moreover, the paper identifies gaps and limitations in the current landscape over the last 10 years and articulates future research directions, culminating in key conclusions that advance the field of VEH in smart civil engineering applications.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.003
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.206
Teacher spread0.201 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDiscover Civil EngineeringSame topicInnovative Energy Harvesting TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207