MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4413887628 · doi:10.1007/s44290-025-00308-7

Vibration-based energy harvesting in large-scale civil infrastructure: a comprehensive outlook of current technologies and future prospects

2025· article· en· W4413887628 on OpenAlexaff
Hooman Kargar Gazkooh, Ayan Sadhu, Kefu Liu

Bibliographic record

VenueDiscover Civil Engineering · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicInnovative Energy Harvesting Technologies
Canadian institutionsLakehead UniversityWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCurrent (fluid)Civil infrastructureScale (ratio)Energy harvestingEnergy (signal processing)VibrationCivil engineeringEngineeringEnvironmental scienceArchitectural engineeringConstruction engineeringComputer scienceSystems engineeringElectrical engineeringPhysicsAcousticsGeographyCartography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Vibration-based energy harvesting (VEH) is a highly sought-after technology that attracts tremendous attention in various engineering applications to meet energy demands. Researchers have published numerous papers discussing various VEH devices utilizing different scavenging methodologies. However, a detailed and comprehensive insight into how this technology could be used in diverse large-scale smart civil infrastructure is lacking. To meet this need, this paper comprehensively reviews VEH techniques in the last decade within civil infrastructure, a critical domain for generating clean, sustainable energy. The review evaluates the deployment of VEH across a diverse range of large-scale infrastructure that consistently encounters vibrations, such as bridges, buildings, wind turbines, railways, tunnels, roads, and pavements. The literature is systematically classified into thematic case studies, employing diverse VEH methodologies, including piezoelectric (PE), electromagnetic (EM), and triboelectric (TE) transduction approaches. This review focuses explicitly on single energy harvesting (EH), where only one energy source and one transduction mechanism are used and does not include hybrid EH mechanisms. This review distinguishes itself by examining a broad spectrum of civil infrastructure, thus highlighting its novelty and expanding beyond previous reviews that focused on a single infrastructure type. Moreover, the paper identifies gaps and limitations in the current landscape over the last 10 years and articulates future research directions, culminating in key conclusions that advance the field of VEH in smart civil engineering applications.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.494
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.206
Teacher spread0.201 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDiscover Civil EngineeringSame topicInnovative Energy Harvesting TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207