Pertunjukan Bapandung: Upaya Untuk Menghentikan Buang Air Besar Sembarangan
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Buang air besar sembarangan merupakan kegiatan yang berpotensi menimbulkan risiko kesehatan, terutama bagi anak-anak, dengan hubungan yang jelas terhadap penyakit diare. Penelitian memiliki tujuan untuk membandingkan pengetahuan siswa sebelum dan sesudah diberikan pementasan bapandung. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode kuantitatif dengan pendekatan quasi eksperimen, dengan desain pre test dan post test control group, melibatkan 35 peserta di SDN Pemurus Baru 1 dan 32 peserta di SDN Pemurus Dalam 1. Intervensi pemetasan bapandung diberikan kepada kelompok intervensi, setelah itu dilakukan pengukuran pengetahuan sebelum dan setelah intervensi. Pengumpulan data menggunakan kuesioner. Hasil menunjukkan bahwa terdapat peningkatan signifikan dalam pengetahuan, di mana 84% siswa kelompok intervensi mencapai kategori baik setelah intervensi, dibandingkan dengan 88% yang berada di kategori kurang sebelum intervensi. Analisis data menggunakan SPSS dengan uji wilcoxon. Hasil uji menunjukkan nilai p hitung dibandingkan dengan nilai α lebih kecil sehingga didapatkan hasil yaitu adanya pengaruh antara pementasan bapandung terhadap tingkat pengetahuan siswa tentang bahaya buang air besar sembarangan.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.012 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".