Analisis Kerusakan pada Beton dengan Citra Digital Menggunakan Metode Edge Canny Detection
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This study aims to design and implement a damage analysis system for concrete surfaces by utilizing digital image processing based on the Canny edge detection method. The developed system allows users to upload images of concrete surfaces, which are then processed through several stages: conversion to grayscale, transformation to binary images, and crack edge detection using the Canny operator. This process aims to automatically detect crack patterns on the concrete surface. The detection results, represented as edge lines, are used to calculate the percentage of the damaged area. Based on this percentage value, the system automatically classifies the damage level into light, moderate, or severe categories. System testing shows that the Canny method can accurately identify crack patterns, with sufficient detection levels to be used in monitoring the condition of concrete surfaces. The analysis results are then presented in both visual and numerical forms, providing valuable information for assessing the structural condition of concrete. Thus, this system can serve as an efficient and effective tool for early detection of structural damage in concrete infrastructure, ultimately supporting better maintenance and repair efforts.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it