MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4413906920 · doi:10.1038/s41598-025-17538-5

High-throughput DNA repair monitoring in Saccharomyces cerevisiae suggests SSB- and DSB-induced chromatin reconfiguration

2025· article· en· W4413906920 on OpenAlexaff
Yael Shalev Ezra, Alon Saguy, G. Levin, Lucien E. Weiss, Onit Alalouf, Yoav Shechtman

Bibliographic record

VenueScientific Reports · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicDNA Repair Mechanisms
Canadian institutionsPolytechnique Montréal
FundersHORIZON EUROPE European Research CouncilEuropean Commission
KeywordsChromatinSaccharomyces cerevisiaeControl reconfigurationChromosomeDNA repairDNABiologyComputational biologyDNA damageCircular bacterial chromosomeGenome instabilityGeneticsCell biologyDNA replicationYeastComputer scienceGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

DNA repair is critical for cellular function and genomic stability across organisms. Yeast mating-type switching serves as an established model for studying DNA break repair and chromosome dynamics. However, real-time tracking of mating-type switching in live cells remains challenging due to resolution limitations of existing techniques. Here, we use high-throughput methods, including three-dimensional imaging, to follow the dynamics of DNA damage and repair and to quantify mating-type switching occurrences at the single live cell level, with unprecedented resolution. We reveal chromosome reconfiguration for both single- and double-strand breaks following switching induction. Our findings provide new observation of the correlation between chromosome folding and single-strand breaks.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.258
Teacher spread0.248 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueScientific Reports→Same topicDNA Repair Mechanisms→French-language works237,207→