FHBDSR-Net: automated measurement of diseased spikelet rate of Fusarium Head Blight on wheat spikes
Bibliographic record
Abstract
) disease that threatens global food security, requires precise quantification of diseased spikelet rate (DSR) as a phenotypic indicator for resistance breeding. Most techniques for measuring DSR rely on manual spikelet-by-spikelet observation and counting, which is inefficient and destructive. Although deep learning offers great promise for automated DSR measurement, existing intelligent detection algorithms are hampered by the lack of spikelet-level annotated data, insufficient feature representation for diseased spikelets, and weak spatial encoding of densely arranged spikelets. To address these challenges, we constructed a dataset of 620 high-resolution RGB images of wheat spikes with 5,222 spikelet-level annotations to systematically analyze spikelet size distributions to fill small-object detection data gaps in this field. We designed FHBDSR-Net, a light framework for automated DSR measurement centered on diseased spikelet detection, which features (1) multi-scale feature enhancement architecture that dynamically combines lesion textures, morphological features, and lesion-awn contrast through adaptive multi-scale kernels to suppress background noise; (2) the Inner-EfficiCIoU loss function to reduce small-target localization errors in dense contexts; and (3) a scale-aware attention module using dilated convolutions and self-attention to encode multi-scale pathological patterns and spatial distributions to enhance dense spikelet resolution. FHBDSR-Net detected diseased spikelets with an average precision of 93.8% with a lightweight design of 7.2 M parameters. The results were strongly correlated with expert evaluations, with a Pearson correlation coefficient of 0.901. Our method is suitable for deployment on resource-constrained mobile devices, facilitating portable plant phenotyping and smart breeding.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".