MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4413910565 · doi:10.64449/9780639889917-05

Unpacking the Role of Big Data, Artificial Intelligence, and Predictive Analytics in Education

2025· book-chapter· en· W4413910565 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueUJ Press eBooks · 2025
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicOnline Learning and Analytics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsUnpackingBig dataPredictive analyticsData scienceAnalyticsComputer scienceArtificial intelligenceData miningPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Goodbye to ChatGPT (chat generative pre-trained transformer), hello to AI (artificial intelligence) on the moon! AI is daring to have its finger touching the surface of the moon. The CMCSS (Canadian Mission Control Space Services) through budgetary funding of $3.04 million by the Canadian Space Agency made history when it launched the Rashid Rover on 11 December 2023, with the aim of spending one lunar day in space. The mission will see the Rover capturing and identifying geological features through pictures, and it was motivated by CMCSS’ urge to be the pioneer in showcasing AI’s DL (deep learning) capabilities first in lunar space. DL is a subset of ML (machine learning) and it relies on large and vast volumes of data, based on complex algorithms to train the model (Rane, Kaya, Mallick, & Rane 2024:218).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.439
Threshold uncertainty score0.544

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.062
GPT teacher head0.293
Teacher spread0.231 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it