MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4413911551 · doi:10.32920/ifmj.v5i1-2.2428

Happenings

2025· article· en· W4413911551 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.

Bibliographic record

VenueInteractive Film and Media Journal · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicSound Studies and Aurality
Canadian institutionsToronto Metropolitan University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhilosophyPsychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Among the many decisive political changes that have occurred in the past few years that bode poorly for our shared future is the US overturning of Roe Wade, and the appointment of men with histories of sexual assault to positions that will determine law and political policy. This paper discusses my new work Happenings, an interactive philosophical essay that takes the form of a cinematically haunted digital poem that mashes up the work of Carolee Schneeman, the nineteen seventies feminist performance artist who famously pulled a scroll out of her vagina, with the work of Gabriel Garcia Marquez, Abel Azonca, and Vladimir Nabokov and other men for whom the imagination of sexual violence was inextricably bound to their art. Schneemann writes in 1991’s “The Obscene Body/Politic”: “I didn’t want to pull a scroll out of my vagina and read it in public, but the culture’s terror of my making overt what it wished to suppress fueled the image; it was essential to demonstrate this lived action about ‘vulvic space’ against the abstraction of the female body and its loss of meaning” (Moreland). Schneeman’s impulse to reach inside and show the world something raw seems again to be necessary. I will situate Happenings somewhere in between the tradition of films that ask you to read written words, such as Michael Snow’s So Is This (1982) and Hollis Frampton’s Poetic Justice (1985), and electronic literature where the written word becomes cinematic, showing how this interactive digital work maintains the opposition between the static (pinned down?) word and free moving image, and gives the moving image medium license to invade and penetrate the other’s spaces. The result is a violation of the rules of genre (is it a book? a film? an essay? a poem? a documentary? a lightbox? horror? philosophy? ) intended to leave the viewer unsteady, and discuss the soundtrack, composited from the BBC Sound Effects’ archive of moths and butterflies, is intended to generate deeply somatic affective responses. I will also discuss how Happenings turns to large language models for some animation and video augmentations, allowing these reservoirs seeded with Western culture memory to reveal their own uncanny and terrifying understanding of women's bodies. My paper presents Happenings as a critique of the philosopher Jean-Luc Nancy’s approach to touch, which refer to the history of painting yet frequently miss the denotative point of artworks that tell the stories of rape, and at the same time de Sadian origins of much of contemporary cultural theory, with the goal of making the argument that contemporary academic culture’s approaches to the body, including much of queer theory, has proceeded by ignoring the reality of assault.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.433
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.350
Teacher spread0.334 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it