MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4413915191 · doi:10.3390/pathogens14090875

Pathological Characteristics of the Emerging Recombinant African Swine Fever Virus Genotypes I and II in Vietnam

2025· article· en· W4413915191 on OpenAlexaff
Việt Dũng Nguyễn, The Viet Hoang Nguyen, Ngoc Duong Vu, Thi Tam Than, Thi Chau Giang Tran, Thi Thu Hang Vu, Thi Lan Nguyen, Yeon Hee Kim, Aruna Ambagala, Van Phan Le

Bibliographic record

VenuePathogens · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicAnimal Disease Management and Epidemiology
Canadian institutionsUniversity of ManitobaCanadian Food Inspection Agency
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGenotypeRecombinant DNAVirologyVirusPathologicalBiologyMedicineGeneticsInternal medicineGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

African swine fever (ASF) is a highly lethal disease caused by the ASF virus (ASFV) and poses a significant threat to the swine industry worldwide. This study investigated the pathogenicity and pathological characteristics of VNUA/rASFV/HD1/23, a recently identified recombinant ASFV genotype I/II in northern Vietnam. Sixteen healthy, seven-week-old pigs divided into four groups were inoculated intramuscularly (IM) with different virus concentrations (102, 103, and 104 HAD50/mL), and their clinical signs, survival times, and pathological alterations were evaluated. All experimentally infected pigs exhibited acute clinical signs characterized by fever, anorexia, depression, diarrhea, and death (4–10 days after injection). The pathological findings included splenomegaly with infarcts, hemorrhagic lymph nodes, and severe pulmonary congestion. The pigs that received the highest dose (104 HAD50/mL) IM showed the earliest onset of clinical signs and the shortest survival time. This study provides important insights into the virulence and the pathological lesions induced by the recombinant genotype I/II ASFV strains that emerged in Vietnam.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.257
Threshold uncertainty score0.115

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.224
Teacher spread0.210 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePathogensSame topicAnimal Disease Management and EpidemiologyFrench-language works237,207