Advanced $X \theta$ Reluctance Electromagnetic Micropositioning System for Precision Motion Control
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This study examines a novel setup of a micropositioning trajectory manipulator in <tex xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">$X \theta$</tex>, energized by a reluctance actuator (RA) and two accompanying moving magnet actuators (MMA). The design is characterized by a C -core RA, which features asymmetrical air gaps between the mover and the stator elements when under angular <tex xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">$\theta$</tex> rotation. When the stator coil is energized, a magnetic flux induces a force in the mover. Two MMAs can add force and torque dynamics to the system via solenoid and permanent magnet (PM) pairs to offer additional corrective actions. Facilitating control of a translational (<tex xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">$x$</tex>) and rotational (<tex xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">$\theta$</tex>) two-degree-of-freedom (2DOF) actuation system. Flexure hinges aid in the retraction force of the mover element and provide needed stiffness to the system without frictional effects. This was modeled analytically and optimized to achieve outlined performance objectives. The system was validated experimentally through triangle, and sinusoidal trajectories in open loop control. The most relevant application is scanning mirror systems where specific targeted rotational and translational trajectories can benefit light beam positioning. This system allows both translation and rotation specifications of a selected trajectory to be realized in one actuation unit, opening up more design possibilities for controlling precision positioning systems.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".