Toward better assistive lower-limb exoskeletons: Insights from stroke survivors through co-design
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Assistive lower-limb exoskeletons (LLEs) have been recognized as promising tools for enhancing physical capacity in stroke survivors. Involving end-users in the early development stages is essential to ensure these technologies meet user needs. Co-design approaches, which actively engage end-users, support this goal. This study aims to (1) evaluate the impact of fatigue on daily living, (2) identify activities that could benefit from LLE assistance, (3) outline design and usability requirements for home-based LLEs, and (4) define physical parameters LLEs should monitor and assess. Discussions were structured using the PERCEPT co-design methodology and thematically analyzed. Four chronic stroke survivors participated in three focus group sessions, each lasting approximately 2 hours. Fatigue was identified as a significant factor in daily life, underscoring the importance of assistive technologies, such as LLEs, to help mitigate exhaustion. Participants recognized LLEs as valuable tools for enhancing physical performance, with benefits for muscle strength, balance, fatigue management, coordination, and general mobility. Design considerations included system modularity, battery efficiency, ease of donning and doffing, and practical needs for daily use. Our findings offer valuable insights into stroke survivors' design and usability concerns regarding LLEs and provide a foundation for advancing the development and adoption of new assistive technologies.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".