DNA Methylation Signatures of Alcohol Use Disorder – A large-scale Meta-Analysis in the Psychiatric Genomics Consortium
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Despite extensive research on DNA methylation (DNAm) signatures associated with alcohol use disorder (AUD), findings are often inconsistent and not replicated. We conducted a large-scale meta-analysis of epigenome-wide association studies (EWAS) to identify reliable, reproducible epigenetic markers of AUD. Seven cohorts, comprising 3,775 individuals (1,325 with AUD), contributed to this meta-analysis within the framework of the Psychiatric Genomics Consortium Substance Use Disorders Epigenetics Working Group. Downstream analyses included the identification of differentially methylated regions, overrepresentation analyses, and the construction of a methylation risk score (MRS). We identified 118 significant CpG sites associated with AUD, with the strongest association found at cg24889777 ( p =5.12×10 -17 ) in the long non-coding RNA LOC100505942. CpG sites were enriched for pathways related to GTPase signaling and transmembrane transporter activity, as well as EWAS signals of alcohol consumption. The MRS explained 10.44% of variance in heavy drinking in an independent cohort (N=2,534, AUC=0.657). This large-scale meta-analysis offers key insights into the epigenetic mechanisms of AUD and lays the groundwork for future research on methylation risk scores for the diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment in AUD.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.014 | 0.018 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.003 | 0.012 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".