A Novel Multifault Diagnosis Method for SRM Drives in Electrified Powertrains
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Switched reluctance motors (SRMs) are recognized as a promising technology for electrified transportation due to their fault-tolerant and rare-earth free features. In transportation applications, particularly in powertrains of the railways and aircraft, the reliability of every component in the motor drive system is of paramount importance. Existing state-of-the-art diagnostic approaches address faults in each component separately, leading to increased system complexity. Therefore, a single algorithm for real-time diagnosis of multiple component faults becomes an attractive solution. This paper presents a simple yet comprehensive technique for detecting and locating nearly all potential electrical faults and current sensor faults in SRM drives at their earliest stages. The proposed diagnostic scheme can effectively identify ten failure cases, including open-circuit and short-circuit faults in power switches, power diodes, phase winding open-circuit faults, and zero-output current sensor faults. Fundamental current and modified dc-bus currents are used for developing fault features, thereby avoiding additional costs and complexity. Digital logic judgments are developed based on the measured currents for fault localization. Simulation studies and rigorous experiments are conducted on a three-phase 12/8 SRM drive system to validate the feasibility and superior performance of the diagnostic scheme.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".