MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4413925757 · doi:10.1109/lsens.2025.3605519

PixTransNet: A Sensor-Aware CNN–Transformer Model for Magnetic Flux Leakage Defect Segmentation

2025· article· en· W4413925757 on OpenAlexaff
Zahra Arabi Narei, Henry Leung, Scott A. Miller, Jyoti Phirani

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Sensors Letters · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicNon-Destructive Testing Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMagnetic flux leakageTransformerLeakage (economics)SegmentationMaterials scienceComputer scienceArtificial intelligenceElectrical engineeringEngineeringEconomicsElectromagnetic coilVoltage

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Magnetic Flux Leakage (MFL) is a widely used non-destructive evaluation (NDE) technique for pipeline inspection. However, its signals are highly sensitive to noise and geometric distortions, causing small defects with limited spatial coverage and subtle defects with low-contrast patterns to be embedded in noise, resulting in indistinct boundaries and irregular shapes that complicate segmentation. To address these challenges, we propose PixTransNet, a hybrid CNN–Transformer model built on a UNet encoder–decoder architecture with a ResNet18 backbone, designed to improve the segmentation and boundary localization of small and subtle defects in MFL signals. We embed pixel-aware transformer blocks into the deeper encoder stages to capture long-range dependencies and enhance the modeling of subtle and fragmented defect patterns. To further enhance the interpretation of MFL signals, we introduce a cross-attention module that selectively emphasizes signal regions with strong structural relevance, leading to more continuous and accurate defect boundaries, particularly for small defects. Extensive experiments on a large-scale dataset of 33,000 MFL images demonstrate that PixTransNet achieves notable improvements in segmentation quality, particularly in detecting small, weak, and low-contrast defects compared to existing baselines. PixTransNet achieves 48.30% IoU, representing a 1.97% improvement, and 70.73% Recall, representing a 13.06% improvement over the best-performing baseline

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.455
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.243
Teacher spread0.230 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Sensors LettersSame topicNon-Destructive Testing TechniquesFrench-language works237,207