MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4413926131 · doi:10.1109/tcad.2025.3605537

<i>QuickCell</i> : Fast Automatic Design of Standard Cells for Silicon Dangling Bond Logic

2025· article· en· W4413926131 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Computer-Aided Design of Integrated Circuits and Systems · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicIntegrated Circuits and Semiconductor Failure Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDangling bondSiliconComputer scienceMaterials scienceOptoelectronics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In recent years, <italic xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">Silicon Dangling Bond</i> (SiDB) logic has emerged as a promising beyond-CMOS technology due to its integration density and operating frequency. This advancement is driving the development of comprehensive design automation workflows, including physical simulators and gate design tools. Unlike conventional circuit technology, where logic is implemented through transistors, SiDB logic utilizes quantum dots with variable charge states. By strategically arranging these dots, standard logic functions like OR, AND, NAND, etc. can be implemented, which are usually provided as <italic xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">Standard Cells</i> in design processes. However, finding such arrangements that implement a given Boolean function is a tremendously complex task that involves considering numerous candidates and verifying them through computationally expensive physical simulation. Hence, the automatic obtainment of SiDB logic layouts is thus far limited to simple 2-input functions only— which already require substantial computation resources. In contrast, conventional physical design algorithms for VLSI have long transitioned from single-gate considerations to multi-input standard cells. To address this challenge, this paper proposes <italic xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">QuickCell</i>: A fast algorithm for automatic standard cell design for SiDB logic that uses dedicated search space pruning techniques. In an extensive experimental evaluation, it is demonstrated that combining these pruning techniques yields 1) a drastic reduction of the search space amounting to up to six orders of magnitude, 2) a corresponding decrease of the runtime by up to a factor of 91, 3) the capability to handle more complex functionality, as, e. g., utilized in standard cells, for the first time, significantly narrowing the gap between SiDB logic and conventional CMOS design paradigms, and 4) a significant speedup compared to physical simulation (up to a factor of 10 000), with near independence from the number of I/O pins when determining the non-operationality of a given layout. This efficiency makes these techniques—and by extension <italic xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">QuickCell</i>—a powerful enabler for the design of complex standard cells.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.985
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.225
Teacher spread0.203 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it