MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4413926131 · doi:10.1109/tcad.2025.3605537

<i>QuickCell</i> : Fast Automatic Design of Standard Cells for Silicon Dangling Bond Logic

2025· article· en· W4413926131 on OpenAlexaff
Jan Drewniok, Marcel Walter, Samuel Sze Hang Ng, Konrad Walus, Robert Wille

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Computer-Aided Design of Integrated Circuits and Systems · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicIntegrated Circuits and Semiconductor Failure Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDangling bondSiliconComputer scienceMaterials scienceOptoelectronics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In recent years,Silicon Dangling Bond(SiDB) logic has emerged as a promising beyond-CMOS technology due to its integration density and operating frequency. This advancement is driving the development of comprehensive design automation workflows, including physical simulators and gate design tools. Unlike conventional circuit technology, where logic is implemented through transistors, SiDB logic utilizes quantum dots with variable charge states. By strategically arranging these dots, standard logic functions like OR, AND, NAND, etc. can be implemented, which are usually provided asStandard Cellsin design processes. However, finding such arrangements that implement a given Boolean function is a tremendously complex task that involves considering numerous candidates and verifying them through computationally expensive physical simulation. Hence, the automatic obtainment of SiDB logic layouts is thus far limited to simple 2-input functions only— which already require substantial computation resources. In contrast, conventional physical design algorithms for VLSI have long transitioned from single-gate considerations to multi-input standard cells. To address this challenge, this paper proposesQuickCell: A fast algorithm for automatic standard cell design for SiDB logic that uses dedicated search space pruning techniques. In an extensive experimental evaluation, it is demonstrated that combining these pruning techniques yields 1) a drastic reduction of the search space amounting to up to six orders of magnitude, 2) a corresponding decrease of the runtime by up to a factor of 91, 3) the capability to handle more complex functionality, as, e. g., utilized in standard cells, for the first time, significantly narrowing the gap between SiDB logic and conventional CMOS design paradigms, and 4) a significant speedup compared to physical simulation (up to a factor of 10 000), with near independence from the number of I/O pins when determining the non-operationality of a given layout. This efficiency makes these techniques—and by extensionQuickCell—a powerful enabler for the design of complex standard cells.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.023
Threshold uncertainty score0.076

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0230.005

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.225
Teacher spread0.203 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Computer-Aided Design of Integrated Circuits and SystemsSame topicIntegrated Circuits and Semiconductor Failure AnalysisFrench-language works237,207