First Report of ‘ <i>Candidatus</i> Phytoplasma fraxini’-Related Strain Associated with Peach Yellows in Pennsylvania
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In the fall of 2015 and 2016, during annual disease surveys conducted by the Pennsylvania Department of Agriculture, seven peach trees (Prunus persica) from a commercial orchard in Berks County, PA, were observed exhibiting symptoms consistent with phytoplasma infection. Symptoms included premature leaf yellowing and reddening, foliar epinasty, shotholes and vein reddening. Seven out of 700 peach trees in the orchard displayed these symptoms and were ultimately removed. Leaf and stem samples were collected from seven symptomatic trees as well as from five asymptomatic ones for further analysis. Total DNA was extracted using the Qiagen DNeasy Plant Kit. All DNA samples were initially screened using a phytoplasma-specific real-time PCR assay (Hodgetts et al., 2009). Phytoplasma was detected in all symptomatic plants, but in none of the five asymptomatic plants. Positive samples were subsequently used in conventional nested PCR targeting the 16S rRNA gene, using primer pairs P1/16S-SR followed by P1A/16S-SR (Deng & Hiruki, 1991; Lee et al., 2004). PCR products were cloned, and sequenced. Four representative sequences were deposited in GenBank under accession numbers PV770936 to PV770939. Sequence analysis using BLASTn (NCBI) and iPhyClassifier (Zhao et al., 2009) revealed that the phytoplasma strains, designated as PYP-PA03, 04, 06, and 07, shared between 97.5% (1,482/1,520 bp) and 97.63% (1,483/1519 bp) sequence identity with the ‘Candidatus Phytoplasma fraxini’ reference strain 16SrVII-A (AF092209), suggesting that the peach associated phytoplasma is a ‘Ca. P. fraxini’-related strain. However, virtual RFLP analysis of the 16S rDNA F2nR2 fragments revealed patterns distinct from all previously established 16Sr groups/subgroups. The closest similarity was observed with members of the 16Sr group VI, but similarity coefficients were below the accepted subgroup threshold (0.97), supporting the distinctiveness of these strains. To further characterize the PYP-PA phytoplasma, partial sequences of the tuf and secA genes were PCR-amplified, cloned, and sequenced following protocols by Makarova et al. (2012) and Dickinson & Hodgetts (2013). The resulting sequences were identical for each gene, and one sequence was deposited in GenBank under accession numbers PV769898 (tuf gene) and PV769899 (secA gene). BLASTn analysis of the tuf gene revealed 93.25% (470/504 bp) and 90.67% (457/504 bp) sequence identity with the homologous gene in the Argentinian alfalfa witches’-broom phytoplasma isolate ArAWB-2021 16SrVII-C (CP131022) and the ‘Ca. P. fraxini’ isolate AshY1 16SrVII-A (CP146843), respectively. Similarly, the secA gene shared 89.16% (691/775 bp) and 88.30% (679/769 bp) sequence identity with the same isolates ArAWB-2021 (CP131022) and AshY1 (CP146843), respectively. These collective results suggest that the PYP-PA phytoplasma is phylogenetically related to members of the Ash yellows group (16SrVII). In 2010, Zunnoon‐Khan et al. identified a phytoplasma strain PRU0430 of group 16SrVII associated with peach trees in Ontario, Canada (GU223903). To our knowledge, the present study is the first to report a ‘Ca. P. fraxini’-related strain associated with peach trees in the United States. These findings highlight the need for further research to fully characterize this potentially novel phytoplasma, which constitutes a distinct lineage from the one identified in Canada and underscore the importance of continued surveillance and molecular investigation of emerging phytoplasma-associated diseases in the region.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".