A Common PD-Risk <i>GBA1</i> Variant Disrupts LIMP2 Interaction, Impairs Glucocerebrosidase Function, and Drives Lysosomal and Mitochondrial Dysfunction
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Summary Variants in GBA1 cause Gaucher disease (GD), a lysosomal storage disorder, and represent the most common genetic risk factor for Parkinson’s disease (PD). While some GBA1 variants are associated with both GD and PD, several coding mutations, including E326K, specifically confer risk for developing PD. It is established that GD-linked variants in β-glucocerebrosidase (GCase), the enzyme encoded by GBA1 , are loss-of-function, but it remains unclear whether variants solely associated with PD similarly reduce GCase activity. The mechanisms by which some of these variants impact GCase activity and PD-associated pathways, including lysosomal and mitochondrial function, are also poorly defined. Here, we show that the PD-linked E326K variant significantly reduces lysosomal GCase activity by impairing its delivery to lysosomes via altered interactions with its receptor, LIMP2. Biophysical and structural characterization of this variant, both alone and in complex with LIMP2, reveals a dimeric organization that appears to result from the loss of a key salt bridge between E326 and R329. Restoration of this salt bridge through the introduction of a negatively charged side chain at position 329 promotes monomeric organization and interaction with LIMP2 in cells. GBA1 -p.E326K cell models show greater deficits in PD-linked pathways compared to more severe loss of GCase function, including secondary lysosomal lipid storage and mitochondrial dysfunction. We confirm the E326K variant impacts GCase pathway activity in relevant CNS cell types, including iPSC-derived microglia, and in biofluids from heterozygous GBA1- p.E326K variant carriers. Together, our data provide key insights into the nature of GCase dysfunction in GBA1 -PD and can inform the development of GCase-targeted therapeutic strategies to treat PD.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".