MVSGDR: multi-view stacked graph convolutional network for drug repositioning
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Drug repositioning (DR) presents a cost-effective strategy for drug development by identifying novel therapeutic applications for existing drugs. Current computational approaches remain constrained by their inability to synergize localized substructure patterns with global network semantics, leading to overreliance on data augmentation to mitigate latent drug-disease association (DDA) information gaps. To address these limitations, we present multi-view stacked graph convolutional network (MVSGDR), a novel DR framework featuring three technical innovations: (i) multi-view stacked module that enables depth-wise feature enhancement through hierarchical aggregation of multi-hop neighborhood interactions across distinct graph convolutional layers; (ii) bi-level subgraph transformer module that decomposes DDAs into METIS (a graph partitioning tool) informative subgraphs for breadth-wise analysis of external and internal subgraph drug-disease relationships; and (iii) negative sampling balancing strategy that mitigates sample imbalance through negative sample synthesis. Extensive 10-fold cross-validation experiments across four benchmark datasets confirm MVSGDR's superior performance, demonstrating its statistically significant improvements over existing methods. Moreover, case studies further validate MVSGDR's potential utility through identification of previously unreported DDAs with supporting literature evidence.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".