MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4413931060 · doi:10.1002/eco.70102

Seismic Lines Are Associated With Enhanced Ground Layer Evapotranspiration in Peatlands

2025· article· en· W4413931060 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Maryam Bayatvarkeshi, Scott J. Ketcheson, Percy Korsah, Megan Schmidt, Nazia Tabassum, Maria Strack

Bibliographic record

VenueEcohydrology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicPeatlands and Wetlands Ecology
Canadian institutionsAthabasca UniversityUniversity of Waterloo
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaUniversity of Waterloo
KeywordsEvapotranspirationPeatEnvironmental scienceHydrology (agriculture)GeologyLayer (electronics)GeographyGeotechnical engineeringEcology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT Evapotranspiration, the combined water loss through both evaporation from the ground surface and transpiration through the vegetation canopy, makes up a substantial portion of the water balance in peatlands in the western boreal region of Canada. Geologic exploration for petroleum resources has created a network of linear clearings, known as seismic lines, that have altered the local hydro‐climatological conditions within the ecosystems that they cross, including peatlands. Accordingly, understanding the interaction between human activities and hydrological fluxes in peatlands is crucial for identifying the processes sensitive to these types of disturbances, especially in a region with a subhumid climate. This study aims to assess the effect of seismic lines on evapotranspiration from the understory at different sites in northern Alberta. Actual evapotranspiration (AET) was measured using weighing lysimeters and chamber techniques, and potential evapotranspiration (PET) was calculated based on the Penman and Priestley–Taylor equation. Understory AET on the seismic lines was 59% and 33% higher than in the adjacent ecosystem, based on lysimeter and chamber measurements, respectively. Furthermore, we also observed that the soil temperature, available photosynthetically active radiation (PAR) and plant community composition were the primary drivers of the AET measured using chambers, while wind speed and PAR controlled the AET measured by lysimeters. We estimated that ground layer PET on the line was 51% higher than off the line. These variations affected the Priestley–Taylor coefficient of evaporability ( α ) values so that the α value on the seismic line (0.73) was higher than off the line (0.61). Accounting for transpiration from trees, it was determined that the AET from seismic lines exceeds the AET from adjacent areas by 31%. Considering the ubiquitous nature and high spatial density of seismic lines in the boreal region, these changes to a dominant water loss mechanism will have a considerable impact on hydrological fluxes and result in an altered water budget, with potential implications at the watershed scale.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.016
Threshold uncertainty score0.913

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.226
Teacher spread0.218 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2025
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEcohydrologySame topicPeatlands and Wetlands EcologyFrench-language works237,207