MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4413931068 · doi:10.47191/ijsshr/v8-i8-103

Socioeducational Observation in Breathwork: Bibliometrics for Rochrematic

2025· article· en· W4413931068 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Claudio-Rafael Vásquez-Martínez, Lic. Carlos Vallin-Gallardo, Dra. Clara-Eugenia Moreno-Ramírez, Edgar-Armando Morales-Flores, Felipe González-Gonzalez, Francisco Flores-Cuevas

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Social Science and Human Research · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicResilience and Mental Health
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBibliometricsComputer scienceLibrary science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The modern digital era brings a problem that has a direct impact on physical and mental health, mainly in young people and adults related to stress, which promotes new health workers to take new care measures such as “yoga” Objective: To describe the scientific production of the topic Breathwork from 2021 to 2025 according to the type of document, category, editors, year of publication, country and language. Method: it was a bibliometric analysis in Web of Science in the Journal Citation Report platform, with the search syntax in English “Breathwork” the search was in all fields. Results: 52 publications, mainly articles (44), review articles (5), meeting summary (2), book under review (1). Its categories in Web of Science are Psychiatry (10), Neurosciences (7), Clinical Psychology (6). Integrative Complementary Medicine (5). Experimental Research Medicine (5). Multidisciplinary Sciences (4). Multidisciplinary Psychology (4). Pharmacology Pharmacy (3). Gastroenterology Hepatology (2). Health Sciences Services (2). Humanities Multidisciplinary (2). Linguistics (2). Elsevier Publishers (11). Taylor & Francis (7). Springer Nature (6). Frontiers Media Sa (3). Mdpi (3), among others (22). and by year was in 2023: (17). 2024 (15). y 2022, (10). 2021, (8). y 2025 (2). The countries with the highest production are USA, (26). England, (11). Canada, (6), Germany, (4), Australia, (3), Poland, (2). Also, the predominant language is English (52) in these publications. Conclusions: The results show low performance in scientific production on the topic of “Breathwork”.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Direct model labels (unvalidated)

Per-model category and study-design labels from the labeling rounds. They are machine output, unvalidated, and the disagreement between models ships as data. No study design here is MEDLINE-validated yet.

Model armCategoriesStudy designConfidence
gemmaBibliometrics
Domain: not available · Genre: Empirical
About the Canadian research system: no · About a Canadian topic: no
Observationalhigh
gptBibliometrics
Domain: not available · Genre: Empirical
About the Canadian research system: no · About a Canadian topic: no
Observationalhigh
models agreeAgreement compares identical category sets and study designs across arms.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.854
Threshold uncertainty score0.472

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0050.004
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.251
GPT teacher head0.632
Teacher spread0.381 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Labeled directly by 2 models reading the full record.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Social Science and Human ResearchSame topicResilience and Mental HealthCategoryBibliometricsFrench-language works237,207