Implication of S-Lactoylglutathione in the Spontaneous Cysteine S-Glutathionylation and Lysine N-Lactoylation of Arabidopsis thaliana NAD-Dependent Glyceraldehyde 3P Dehydrogenase
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this study, the involvement of S,D-lactoylglutathione in the modification of the iso-form 1 of cytosolic glyceraldehyde 3P dehydrogenase (GAPC1) is examined. Incuba-tion of GAPC1 with S,D-lactoylglutathione resulted in inhibition of enzyme activity. The inhibitory effect was concentration-dependent and increased at alkaline pHs. Furthermore, inhibition of GAPC1 by S,D-lactoylglutathione was favored by oxidative conditions and reversed by reduction with dithiothreitol. Analyses of the S,D-lactoylglutathione-treated protein by nano LC-MS/MS revealed S-glutathionylation of its two Cys residues and N-lactoylation of six Lys residues. Pro-tein structure prediction showed that the double S-glutathionylation is accommodated by the GAPC1 catalytic pocket which likely explains enzyme inhibition. N-lactoylated sites overlap partially with previously reported N-acetylated sites at the surface of the GAPC1 tetramer. The efficiency of cytosolic glutaredoxin and thioredoxin isoforms was tested for reversing the S,D-lactoylglutathione-induced modification. In these as-says, recovery of GAPC1 activity after inhibition by S,D-lactoylglutathione treatment was used as indicator of efficiency. Results show that both types of redoxins were able to reverse inhibition. We propose a model describing the mechanisms involved in the two types of post-translational modification found on GAPC1 following exposure to S,D-lactoylglutathione. The possible involvement of these findings for the control over glycolytic metabolism is discussed.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".