MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4413936647 · doi:10.1007/jhep09(2025)033

All loop scattering for all multiplicity

2025· article· en· W4413936647 on OpenAlexafffund
Nima Arkani–Hamed, Hadleigh Frost, Giulio Salvatori, P-G. Plamondon, Hugh Thomas

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of High Energy Physics · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicAdvanced Algebra and Geometry
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à Montréal
FundersInstitut Universitaire de FranceCanada Research ChairsAgence Nationale de la RechercheNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaEuropean CommissionU.S. Department of Energy
KeywordsPhysicsMultiplicity (mathematics)Particle physicsLoop (graph theory)ScatteringQuantum electrodynamicsTheoretical physicsNuclear physicsMathematical physicsQuantum mechanicsCombinatoricsGeometry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A bstract We study the recently introduced curve integral formalism that defines a new family of formulas for the scattering amplitudes of the colored scalar tr ϕ 3 theory. We find that the curve integral manifests a very surprising fact about these amplitudes: the dependence on the number of particles, n , and the loop order, L , is effectively decoupled in these formulas. We derive the curve integrals at tree-level for all n . We then show that, for higher loop-order, it suffices to study the curve integrals for L -loop tadpole-like amplitudes, which have just one particle per color trace-factor. By combining these tadpole-like formulas with the tree-level results, we find formulas for the all n amplitudes at L loops. We illustrate this result by giving explicit curve integrals for all the amplitudes in the theory, including the non-planar amplitudes, through to two loops, for all n .

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.030

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0020.004
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0090.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.311
Teacher spread0.284 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations19
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of High Energy PhysicsSame topicAdvanced Algebra and GeometryFrench-language works237,207