MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4413939228 · doi:10.24908/iqurcp19902

Linking mass spectrometry data to tumour activity: A preliminary investigation

2025· article· en· W4413939228 on OpenAlexaffvenue
R J Thériault, Randy E. Ellis

Bibliographic record

VenueInquiry Queen s Undergraduate Research Conference Proceedings · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicMass Spectrometry Techniques and Applications
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMass spectrometryMass spectrometry imagingComputational biologyChemistryComputer scienceChromatographyBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Objective To identify which metabolites and pathways distinguish tumour from non-tumour regions in patient tissues and explain their relevance using established cancer hallmarks. Background Tumours rewire cellular metabolism, leaving detectable fingerprints in mass spectrometry (MS) profiles. Biological pathways involve coordinated changes across many metabolites; hence, patterns across thousands of m/z values were condensed into the importance spectrum because single peaks rarely tell the full story of cellular activity. Methods I developed and utilised an interpretation pipeline that connects mass-to-charge (m/z) feature portraits to metabolites, maps those metabolites to pathways, and relates pathway activity to established cancer hallmarks. Discriminative m/z peaks (retaining features ≥ 98 m/z) were identified per sample and ranked in an importance spectrum. This spectrum is a profile indicating each feature’s contribution to distinguishing tumour vs non-tumour in tissue. Putative metabolite identities were identified via the Human Metabolome Database (HMDB), then aggregated to biological pathways using the Small Molecule Pathway Database (SMPDB). The results in a pathway-level view that contextualises isolated peaks as parts of coordinated biochemical processes. To ground these signals in established biology, identified pathways were cross-referenced to canonical cancer hallmarks. Each pathway was correlated to one or more hallmarks with support from literature. This provides a principled bridge from ion signals to recognised cancer biology. Results In patient tissues, high-importance m/z features are frequently mapped to upregulated metabolites in dysregulated pathways affected by tumours. This is consistent with metabolic reprogramming seen in cancer biology. Conclusion In conclusion, the metabolite and pathway patterns correlate with well-defined cancer behaviours that boost tumourigenesis, metastasis, and a pro-angiogenic microenvironment.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.011
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.024

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.011
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.003
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.143
GPT teacher head0.397
Teacher spread0.254 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInquiry Queen s Undergraduate Research Conference ProceedingsSame topicMass Spectrometry Techniques and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207