MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4413940304 · doi:10.1002/bcp.70206

GS‐443902 concentrations in peripheral blood mononuclear cells and dried blood spots among pregnant and non‐pregnant women receiving remdesivir for COVID‐19 treatment

2025· article· en· W4413940304 on OpenAlexaff
Andrew Dunbar, Kristin Baltrusaitis, Diana F. Clarke, Sharon Nachman, Kathleen M. Powis, Alice Stek, Ahizechukwu C. Eke, Daniel S. Shapiro, Edmund V. Capparelli, Frederic Bone, Elizabeth Greene, Kathy George, Di Yin, Patrick Jean‐Philippe, Nahida Chakhtoura, Kathryn Kersey, Lane R. Bushman, Laura Roon, Brookie M. Best, Mark Mirochnick, Jeremiah D. Momper, Kelly A Brooks

Bibliographic record

VenueBritish Journal of Clinical Pharmacology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCOVID-19 Impact on Reproduction
Canadian institutionsImpact
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDried bloodPeripheral blood mononuclear cellCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)MedicineSevere acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2)ObstetricsPeripheral bloodPregnancy2019-20 coronavirus outbreakVirologySpotsImmunologyInternal medicineBiologyPathologyChemistryChromatography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

2 Background: Activation of remdesivir (RDV) has typically been assessed by measuring concentrations of GS-443902 (active triphosphate) in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC). We previously showed concentrations of RDV, and its major plasma metabolites were similar between pregnant and non-pregnant women with COVID-19, while those of GS-443902 in PBMC were ~50% lower in pregnancy. Dried blood spots (DBS) provide a simpler alternative to PBMC collection and may serve as another surrogate measure of cellular drug activation, but pregnancy status and inflammation due to COVID-19 may impact these measures. Here, we evaluated factors that affect GS-443902 in DBS and PBMC and relationships between cell types in pregnant and non-pregnant women with COVID-19. Methods: IMPAACT 2032 (NCT04582266) was a Phase IV prospective, open label, non-randomized, opportunistic study of hospitalized pregnant and non-pregnant women receiving intravenous RDV as part of clinical care for COVID-19. DBS and PBMC were isolated pre-dose and/or 23-h post-dose on infusion Days 3, 4 and 5. GS-443902 concentrations in each cell type were quantified using LC–MS/MS methods from 2 × 7 mm punches (DBS) or cell pellets (PBMCs). Generalized linear mixed effects modelling (1) evaluated the effect of pregnancy and baseline covariates on log-transformed GS-443902 in DBS and PBMC using forward selection (p < 0.2) and backwards elimination (p < 0.1) after adjusting for infusion number and (2) assessed relationships between GS-443902 in DBS vs. PBMC. Results: About 76 dB and PBMC observations were available from 51 participants (25 pregnant, 26 non-pregnant). Median (interquartile range) GS-443902 concentrations in DBS were 1807 (1395, 2292) and 1633 (1267, 2412) fmol/punch and in PBMC were 2.96 (0.79, 6.89) and 5.15 (3.22, 8.77) μM for pregnant and non-pregnant participants, respectively. In DBS, GS-443902 concentrations were 19% lower (90% CI −33, −2.5%) during pregnancy, increases in SBP (per 10 mmHg) were associated with an 8.1% decrease (90% CI −11.4%, −4.7%) and increases in ALP (per 10 U/L) and platelet count (per 50x109 cells/L) were associated with a 1.4% (90% CI 0.3%, 1.8%) and 5.3% (90% CI 0.8%, 13.4%) increase, respectively. In PBMC, GS-443902 concentrations were 45% lower (90% CI −19.4%, −61.8%) in pregnant vs. non-pregnant participants with each additional infusion. Increases in ALP and ALT (per 10 U/L) were associated with a 4.2% decrease (90% CI −7.7%, −0.6%) and 11.4% decrease (90% CI −18.8%, −3.4%) in GS-443902 concentrations in PBMC, respectively. For DBS vs. PBMC comparisons, GS-443902 concentrations in PBMCs increased by 7.7% (90% CI 4.0%, 11.6%) for every 100 fmol/punch increase in DBS for non-pregnant women; however, in pregnant women, there was a 4.4% decrease (90% CI −7.9%, −0.8%) for GS-443902 in PBMC for every 100 fmol/punch increase in DBS. Conclusions: Cellular disposition of GS-443902 between DBS and PBMCs differed by pregnancy status and other clinical factors associated with COVID-19 disease severity. The mechanisms and clinical significance of these differences are unknown. Further investigation into how pregnancy and other disease-specific factors affect cellular concentrations is warranted.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.276
Threshold uncertainty score0.823

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.041
GPT teacher head0.408
Teacher spread0.366 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBritish Journal of Clinical PharmacologySame topicCOVID-19 Impact on ReproductionFrench-language works237,207