MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4413942153 · doi:10.1002/cac2.70058

Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy with capecitabine and irinotecan guided by <i>UGT1A1</i> status in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer: 5‐year update of the CinClare trial

2025· article· en· W4413942153 on OpenAlexaff
Zhen Zhang, Xinchen Sun, Anwen Liu, Yaqun Zhu, Tao Zhang, Luying Liu, Jianhui Jia, Shisheng Tan, Junxin Wu, Xin Wang, Juying Zhou, Jialin Yang, Chen Zhang, Hongyan Zhang, Xinjia He, Gang Cai, Cheng-Yi Huang, Fan Xia, Juefeng Wan, Hui Zhang, Lijun Shen, Ling Wang, Wei Zhang, Sanjun Cai, Ji Zhu

Bibliographic record

VenueCancer Communications · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicColorectal Cancer Treatments and Studies
Canadian institutionsCAE (Canada)
FundersKey Research and Development Program of Zhejiang ProvinceNational Health Commission of the People's Republic of ChinaNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsCapecitabineIrinotecanColorectal cancerMedicineOncologyInternal medicineChemoradiotherapyNeoadjuvant therapyCancer

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background The optimal regimen and chemotherapy intensity are still under investigation for neoadjuvant treatment of locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC). The CinClare trial has demonstrated improved pathologic complete response (pCR) with the addition of irinotecan to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRT) guided by uridine diphosphate glucuronosyltransferase 1A1 ( UGT1A1) genotype in LARC. Here, we report the 5‐year follow‐up outcomes of the CinClare study. Methods From November 2015 to December 2017, this randomized, open‐label, multicenter, phase III trial enrolled 360 patients with LARC and assigned them in a 1:1 ratio to CapIriRT (radiation with capecitabine combined with irinotecan followed by irinotecan and capecitabine) or CapRT (radiation with concurrent capecitabine followed by oxaliplatin and capecitabine). Irinotecan dosing was guided by UGT1A1 genotype (80 mg/m 2 for *1/*1 and 65 mg/m 2 for *1/*28 ). The endpoints, including local control (LC), distant metastasis‐free survival (DMFS), disease‐free survival (DFS), and overall survival (OS), were analyzed using the log‐rank test, Cox proportional hazards regression and restricted mean survival time (RMST) test at the data cut‐off date of June 2023. Results With a median follow‐up of 60 months, the CapIriRT group showed numerically higher 5‐year LC (95.6% vs. 93.9%), 5‐year DMFS (83.9% vs. 77.9%), 5‐year DFS (77.7% vs. 70.6%), and 5‐year OS rates (82.9% vs. 76.1%) than the CapRT group. Further RMST test also showed a statistically significant difference in DFS ( P < 0.05) and a borderline difference in OS ( P = 0.050). Among the UGT1A1 *1/*1 population, the CapIriRT group had significantly improved 5‐year rates of DMFS, DFS, and OS (all P < 0.05). Patients achieving pCR also had significantly longer DFS and OS compared to non‐pCR patients ( P < 0.05). Conclusions The addition of irinotecan guided by UGT1A1 genotype to a standard capecitabine‐based scheme brings clinical benefits with improved LC, DMFS, DFS, and OS. Patients with the UGT1A1 *1/*1 genotype derived notable benefit from irinotecan, with improved survival outcomes. Achievement of pCR is crucial as it is associated with improved long‐term survival. These findings support the integration of genomic testing into clinical practice to achieve a personalized irinotecan dosing regimen, which can optimize efficacy and safety. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02605265).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.007
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Randomized trial · Consensus signal: Randomized trial
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.035

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0070.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.003
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.291
Teacher spread0.281 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designRandomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCancer CommunicationsSame topicColorectal Cancer Treatments and StudiesFrench-language works237,207