MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4413942978 · doi:10.3389/fnins.2025.1683967

Correction: The circadian genes are required in DAL neurons for Drosophila long-term memory formation

2025· erratum· en· W4413942978 on OpenAlexaff
Jerry C. P. Yin, Ethan Cui, Peter S Johnstone, Deniz Top, Grace Boekhoff‐Falk, Hong Zhou

Bibliographic record

VenueFrontiers in Neuroscience · 2025
Typeerratum
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicCircadian rhythm and melatonin
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTerm (time)Drosophila (subgenus)Circadian rhythmNeuroscienceShort-term memoryBiologyGeneComputer scienceGeneticsWorking memoryPhysicsCognition

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The original version of this article has been updated.A correction has been made to Figure 1 Legend. Correction in red.The LABL reporter oscillates in DAL neurons and circadian mutants have normal 3-day memory. (A) The LABL reporter system. Cartoon of three transgenes (shown as line cartoons) that are present in the same fly. The first transgene expresses the transcription factor Gal4 in a DAL-specific anatomical pattern. The Gal4 protein acts on UAS sequences to make the FLP recombinase (second line cartoon). The third transgene contains a fragment from the period promoter (perP) and a FLP-out cassette (triangles flanking mCherry, followed by stop codons in all reading frames) upstream of the coding region for luciferase (missing its ATG start codon). The black arrow signifies the start of transcription and translation. In the presence of FLP, recombination at the FRT sites results in deletion of one FRT site and the intervening sequences, including the translation termination codons (fourth line cartoon). (B) FLP expression in DAL neurons results in oscillating reporter activity. When the LABL system is driven using the DAL-specific Gal4 lines (G0338 [left plot in orange] or G0431 [right plot in magenta]), transcriptional activity oscillates. Luminescence (in arbitrary units) is plotted as a function of time. Daytime and nighttime periods are shown in light and dark gray and the vertical black lines indicate a 24-h period. The best fit maxima and minima for each 24-h period are shown with circles. (C) LABL oscillates with an approximate 24-h periodicity in DAL neurons. Data from the LABL experiments (n = 4) is analyzed as before (Johnstone et al., 2022). Morlet wave analysis for the entire 9 days shows that the periodicity of both reporters is about 24 h. Confidence intervals are shown in shades of color and indicated above the figure. The violin plots indicate the spread of all the data points. (D) Mutations in tim and cyc do not significantly affect 3d memory. The 3d performance indices for wild-type (iso31) and mutant stocks are plotted as a function of genotype. There is no significant difference in either mutant when compared to its wild type control.Reminder: Figures, tables, and images will be published under a Creative Commons CC-BY license and permission must be obtained for use of copyrighted material from other sources (including re-published/adapted/modified/partial figures and images from the internet). It is the responsibility of the authors to acquire the licenses, to follow any citation instructions requested by third-party rights holders, and cover any supplementary charges.Adding/removing text Name of a fly stock (G0388) is incorrect. Corrections shown in red (G0338).A correction has been made to the section Materials and methods (section), Flies (subsection), First paragraph Corrections in red:All the flies used have been validated and published previously. For the reporter experiments, the G0338or G0431-Gal4 driver lines (which are both expressed in DAL neurons) are combined with the two other transgenes (period-promoter-FRT-luciferase and 20xUAS-FLP) that comprise the LABL system (Chen et al., 2012;Lin et al., 2021;Johnstone et al., 2022). For olfactory behavior, circadian and sleep experiments, progeny from a cross between one parent homozygous for two different transgenes and a second parent homozygous for a third transgene are used. The DAL specific driver line (G0431) is combined with the tubulinP-Gal80ts transgene in the doubly transgenic parent (w 1118 ; G0431-Gal4; tubulinP-GAL80 ts ). For the rest of this report, this genotype will be shortened to G0431; tubulinP-Gal80 ts . The other parent is one of: . These four genotypes will be shortened to: UAS-clk Δ , UAS-cyc Δ , UAS-clk RNAi and UAS-cyc RNAi . The tubulinP-Gal80 ts transgene makes the Gal80 ts protein ubiquitously. In the progeny flies that contain all three transgenes, at low temperature (20°C) the Gal80 ts protein is active and represses Gal4 from acting. At the restrictive temperature (29°C), the Gal80 ts protein is inactive and Gal4 becomes active. For assays of circadian locomotor activity and sleep, the parents and progeny from two of the crosses (those involving UAS-clk Δ _or UAS-cyc Δ ) are used. The UAS-cyc Δ _and UAS-clk Δ _flies are from P. Hardin, although the UAS-clk Δ stock is available through BDSC (#36319). The cyc o , tim o stocks along with their isogenic wild-type control flies are from A. Sehgal. The G0338 and G0431-Gal4 driver lines and the doubly transgenic parent (G0431; tubulinP-GAL80 ts ) are from T. Tully.A correction has been made to the section Materials and methods (section), LABL reporter assay (subsection) Correction in red:Flies of the correct genotype (with the DAL-specific Gal4 driver lines [either G0338 or G0431], the LABL transgenic reporter and the UAS-FLP transgene) are assayed and analyzed as described previously (Johnstone et al., 2022).Corrections have been made to the section Results (Section), A period-promoter based reporter cycles in DAL neurons (Subsection).Previously we showed that ubiquitous, post-training, inducible disruption of the circadian system interferes with 3-day (3d) memory formation (Yin et al., 2023). Chen et al. inferred that the circadian genes are expressed in the dorsal-anterior lateral (DAL) neurons, a pair of neurons located outside of the canonical central clock network, and showed that DAL neurons are important for 1d memory (Chen et al., 2012). Subsequent single-cell transcriptomic work shows that the circadian genes cycle, pdp1 and cry are likely expressed in the DAL neurons (Crocker et al., 2016;Supplemental Table 6, #287, #676 and #712). In this report we ask whether the circadian genes in those neurons are important for 3d memory.Initially we use the LABL reporter system to ask if there is detectable oscillatory transcriptional activity in DAL neurons (Johnstone et al., 2022). Reporter activity is an indirect measure for CLK and CYC activity since the LABL reporter contains a minimal period promoter that results in oscillatory activity if CLK and CYC bind to a consensus E-box sequence (Bargiello et al., 1987). Figure 1A cartoons the necessary components in this system, and we test it in DAL using the G0338 or G0431 Gal4 driver lines (Chen et al., 2012).Figure 1B shows reporter activity when FLP is expressed in DAL neurons. Luminescence (in arbitrary units) is plotted as a function of time for the G0338-(left side plot in orange) and G0431-driven (right side plot in purple) reporters, with the subjective day (light gray) and subjective night (dark gray) periods indicated. The closed circles represent the best fits for maxima and minima of the oscillating activity each day. Although the amplitudes are low, both G0338-and G0431-driven reporter activities oscillate. Morlet wavelet analysis (Figure 1C) indicates that the periodicity of the oscillations cluster around 24 h for all confidence intervals, consistent with circadian-regulated transcription. The violin plots to the right of each Morlet wavelet analysis show that the periodicities across the entire 9d interval cluster around 24 h for reporters activated using both drivers. Since CLK/CYC heterodimers are major contributors to oscillating transcription from the period promoter, they are likely to be expressed and active in DAL neurons, confirming findings from prior work (Bargiello et al., 1987;Chen et al., 2012;Crocker et al., 2016). Crocker et al. reported detecting the expression of the circadian genes cyc, pdp1 and cry in DAL neurons using a scRNA sequencing approach (Crocker et al., 2016).The original version of this article has been updated.for a reason not seen here, please contact the journal's editorial office.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.025
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.093
Threshold uncertainty score0.310

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.025
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0030.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0930.035

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.266
Teacher spread0.237 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFrontiers in NeuroscienceSame topicCircadian rhythm and melatoninFrench-language works237,207