MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4413950080 · doi:10.1681/asn.0000000853

Diagnostic Yield of Various Serum Creatinine Testing Frequencies in People at Risk for CKD

2025· article· en· W4413950080 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Marcello Tonelli, Natasha Wiebe, Ron T. Gansevoort, Brenda R. Hemmelgarn, Braden Manns, Robert R. Quinn, Michael G. Shlipak, Matthew T. James

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the American Society of Nephrology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicChronic Kidney Disease and Diabetes
Canadian institutionsUniversity of AlbertaUniversity of Calgary
FundersUniversity of CalgaryAlberta Health Services
KeywordsMedicineKidney diseaseDiabetes mellitusComorbidityAlbuminuriaInternal medicineCreatininePopulationCohortRenal functionEndocrinologyEnvironmental health

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Key Points The annual incidence of CKD is relatively low (approximately 2%) even in groups that are considered at higher risk, such as people with diabetes or hypertension. A substantial number of people are tested at least annually for CKD despite being at very low risk, such as those with an annual incidence of 0.02%. Considering age together with other risk factors for CKD to determine the frequency of testing may increase the diagnostic yield for incident CKD. Background Guidelines recommend regular serum creatinine testing to detect CKD among people with diabetes or hypertension, but the ideal frequency of testing is unknown. We determined the diagnostic yield for incident CKD as defined by ≥2 measures of eGFR <60 ml/min per 1.73 m 2 , based on testing frequencies of every 2, 3, 4, or 5 years as compared with annually. Methods We did a retrospective population-based cohort study of 3,515,163 adults older than 18 years with eGFR >60 ml/min per 1.73 m 2 at baseline in Alberta, Canada. We assessed diagnostic yield overall and in categories defined by age, sex, comorbidity, albuminuria, or levels of a multivariable risk score for CKD. Results Assuming annual testing, the number of tests needed (NTN) to detect one new CKD case was >67-fold higher among those younger than 50 years (2149, [95% confidence interval (CI), 2103 to 2196]) as compared with older than 70 years (32, [95% CI, 32 to 32]). NTN for annual testing was 50 (95% CI, 49 to 50) among people with diabetes, 57 (95% CI, 57 to 58) in those with hypertension, and 20 (95% CI, 20 to 21) among people with heart failure. When stratified by CKD risk score, the NTN for annual testing ranged from 7 (95% CI, 7 to 8) at a score of 9 (highest risk) to 5708 (95% CI, 5494 to 5930) at a score of 0 (lowest risk). Testing people with diabetes every 3 years instead of every year would delay the diagnosis of CKD by a mean of 1.5 years for 2, 12, and 32 per 1000 people with diabetes aged <50, 50–70, and >70 years, respectively. Corresponding delays associated with testing people with hypertension every 3 years instead of every year would affect 2, 9, and 27 per 1000 people aged <50, 50–70, and >70 years, respectively. If applied to all adult Albertans, these two changes in testing frequency would potentially avert more than 5.9 million laboratory assays over the next decade. Conclusions Tailoring the frequency of serum creatinine testing according to age and the presence of other risk factors would decrease the NTN to detect cases of incident CKD.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.029
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.031
Threshold uncertainty score0.062

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.029
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.277
Teacher spread0.261 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the American Society of Nephrology→Same topicChronic Kidney Disease and Diabetes→French-language works237,207→