THE CURRENT STATE OF ASSESSMENT ZONING OF TERRITORIES: RUSSIAN AND FOREIGN EXPERIENCE
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The article considers the key role of appraisal zoning in the system of state cadastral valuation and taxation of real estate. The methodology of forming homogeneous appraisal zones as a basis for mass cadastral valuation of real estate is consistently disclosed. The rationale is that appraisal zoning is a methodologically significant tool for increasing the accuracy, objectivity and economic confirmation of cadastral value calculations. The main principles of zoning are set out, and the algorithm for forming zones is described. The functioning of the Russian appraisal system is considered, a comparative analysis of zoning practices in leading foreign countries is given: the USA, Germany and Canada. The article shows that, despite the differences, all approaches use GIS and statistical methods to ensure a fair tax base, and reveals the pros and cons of each system, suggesting possible areas for improving domestic practice in the light of international experience.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it