MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4413951158 · doi:10.1016/j.rineng.2025.106766

Solar and battery-oriented grid connected microgrid for peak and off peak hour operation

2025· article· en· W4413951158 on OpenAlexafffund
Md. Fatin Ishraque, Kamil Ahmad, Sk. A. Shezan, M. Shamim Hossain, Md. Ruhul Amin, Innocent Kamwa

Bibliographic record

VenueResults in Engineering · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMicrogrid Control and Optimization
Canadian institutionsUniversité Laval
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaNorthern Border UniversityUniversity Grants CommissionUniversité Laval
KeywordsMicrogridBattery (electricity)GridPhotovoltaic systemEnvironmental scienceElectrical engineeringAutomotive engineeringComputer scienceEngineeringRenewable energyPower (physics)PhysicsGeographyGeodesy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The rising demand for sustainable and stable energy solutions has intensified interest in hybrid microgrids that integrate renewable sources with storage systems. However, frequent connection and disconnection to the main grid during peak and off-peak hours often introduce voltage and frequency instabilities, threatening system reliability. This study proposes a grid-connected solar and hydrogen-battery microgrid, optimized using advanced dispatch strategies and power plant controllers to mitigate such instabilities. Three control methods—Constant Q, Voltage Iq-Droop, and Voltage Q-Droop—are implemented and comparatively analyzed for their effectiveness in stabilizing voltage, frequency, power factor, and active/reactive power. Additionally, two dispatch strategies, Load Following (LF) and Cycle Charging (CC), are evaluated under derivative-free optimization to ensure cost-effective and low-emission operation. Results show the Constant Q controller delivers superior system stability and power quality. The optimized system achieves a renewable energy fraction of 89.1%, sells 192,161 kWh/year to the grid, and operates at an exceptionally low cost of $0.0132/kWh. Furthermore, the system demonstrates a 73% internal rate of return, a simple payback period of 1.4 years, and minimal CO 2 (18,647 kg/year) and SO 2 (80.8 kg/year) emissions. These outcomes affirm the feasibility and scalability of the proposed hybrid system for clean and stable power generation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.002
GPT teacher head0.181
Teacher spread0.179 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueResults in EngineeringSame topicMicrogrid Control and OptimizationFrench-language works237,207