AI-Enhanced Model for Integrated Performance Prediction and Classification of Vibration-Reducing Gloves for Hand-Transmitted Vibration Control
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This study presents a human-centric, data-driven modeling framework for the intelligent evaluation and classification of vibration-reducing (VR) gloves used in hand-transmitted vibration environments. Recognizing the trade-offs between protection and functionality, the integrated performance assessment incorporates three critical and often conflicting metrics: manual dexterity, grip strength, and distributed vibration transmissibility at the palm and fingers. Three independent experiments involving fifteen participants were conducted to evaluate the individual performance of ten commercially available VR gloves fabricated from air bladders, polymers, and viscoelastic gels. The effects of VR gloves on manual dexterity, grip strength, and distributed vibration transmission were investigated. The resulting experimental data were used to train and tune seven different machine learning models. The results suggested that the AdaBoost model demonstrated superior predictive performance, achieving 92% accuracy in efficiently evaluating the integrated performance of VR gloves. It is further shown that the proposed data-driven model could be effectively applied to classify the performances of VR gloves in three workplace conditions based on the dominant vibration frequencies (low-, medium-, and high-frequency). The proposed framework demonstrates the potential of AI-enhanced intelligent actuation systems to support personalized selection of wearable protective equipment, thereby enhancing occupational safety, usability, and task efficiency in vibration-intensive environments.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".