MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4413956541 · doi:10.29284/iisae.1.2.2025.8-15

Efficient Resource Cloud Formation Using Virtualization in SLA-Based Cloud Technologies

2025· article· en· W4413956541 on OpenAlexaff
Senthil Kumar Seeni, Lalitha Kalaichelvan, Suman Devi, B Beaula Pinky, Jayabharathi Ramasamy, K Navaz, T. Edwin Prabakaran

Bibliographic record

VenueInnovations in Intelligent Systems and Advanced Engineering · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicCloud Computing and Resource Management
Canadian institutionsArtificial Intelligence in Medicine (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCloud computingVirtualizationComputer scienceResource (disambiguation)Operating systemComputer network

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cloud computing has arisen as a viable remedy to the constraints of conventional IT systems, product delivery methodologies, and application management methods, including licensing, configuration, and maintenance. Transitioning from traditional platforms to cloud-based settings diminishes customer-side complexity and expenses, while guaranteeing continuous income for Software as a Service (SaaS) suppliers. Service Level Agreements (SLAs) are instituted as enforceable promises between customers and providers to uphold quality of service (QoS). The main objectives for SaaS providers are to minimize operating expenditures and to maximize Customer Satisfaction Levels (CSL). The present work presents customer-centric SLA algorithms for effective resource allocation, aimed at cost reduction through the minimization of support overheads, fines, and SLA breaches. The suggested system amalgamates user profiles and supplier performance data to encapsulate intricate client needs and tackle heterogeneity across business networks. Customer-specific factors, like enhancement request rates and infrastructure-level metrics such as job initiation timings, are integrated for precise decision-making. Simulation outcomes indicate substantial enhancements, with a 54% reduction in total costs and a 45% drop in SLA breaches, surpassing traditional optimization methods.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.695
Threshold uncertainty score0.595

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.003
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.245
Teacher spread0.233 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInnovations in Intelligent Systems and Advanced EngineeringSame topicCloud Computing and Resource ManagementFrench-language works237,207