MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

AI-enabled Resource Allocation for BD-RIS Empowered ISAC Systems

2025· preprint· en· W4413962432 on OpenAlexaff
Samaneh Bidabadi, Messaoud Ahmed Ouameur, Miloud Bagaa, Daniel Massicotte, Felipe A. P. de Figueiredo, Anas Chaaban

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSpace Satellite Systems and Control
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British ColumbiaUniversité du Québec à Trois-Rivières
Fundersnot available
KeywordsResource allocationResource (disambiguation)Engineering managementComputer scienceBusinessProcess managementEngineeringComputer network

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Reconfigurable intelligent surfaces (RIS) have emerged as pivotal elements in enhancing integrated sensing and communication (ISAC) systems. Among RIS architectures, the beyond-diagonal (BD-RIS) design stands out for its advanced beamforming capabilities compared to traditional diagonal RIS. This paper investigates the deployment of BD-RIS to optimize energy efficiency through passive and active beamforming strategies while ensuring robust communication and sensing quality. The task is particularly challenging due to constraints inherent in BD-RIS configurations, including orthogonality, quartic inequalities, and the fractional nature of the objective function. To address these complexities, we employ twin delayed deep deterministic policy gradient (TD3) models, a state-of-the-art deep reinforcement learning (DRL) approach. Numerical validations confirm the effectiveness of our proposed algorithm and highlight the benefits of integrating BD-RIS into ISAC systems. Simulations demonstrate that incorporating BD-RIS leads to significant energy efficiency gains compared to benchmarks using diagonal RIS and RIS with random phase shifts.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.234
Teacher spread0.225 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicSpace Satellite Systems and ControlFrench-language works237,207