MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4413963433 · doi:10.1097/ipc.0000000000001513

Group A Streptococcal Infection

2025· article· en· W4413963433 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueInfectious Diseases in Clinical Practice · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicStreptococcal Infections and Treatments
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineSTREPTOCOCCAL INFECTIONSImmunology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Streptococcus pyogenes, a gram-positive bacterium commonly referred to as group A Streptococcus (GAS) is a notable human pathogen that poses a substantial danger to global health care, infecting over 18 million individuals and causing more than 500,000 fatalities each year.1 GAS can induce a spectrum of clinical infections, ranging from mild conditions such as pharyngitis and impetigo to severe invasive infections (iGAS), including sepsis, streptococcal toxic shock syndrome (STSS), and necrotizing fasciitis. Erysipelas, glomerulonephritis, suppurative tonsillitis, scarlet fever, and rheumatic fever are further diseases attributable to GAS.2 GAS infection rates progressively diminished throughout the 20th century in Western nations, primarily attributable to enhanced living standards and increased availability of antibiotics. The severity of GAS infections escalates when they coincide with other viral infections, suggesting a credible hypothesis regarding the potential for COVID-19 to facilitate coinfections with invasive group A Streptococcus (iGAS), hence contributing to the notable rise in iGAS infections during the pandemic.3 Post–COVID-19, there has been a significant rise in GAS infection rates in Europe, the United States, Australia, and New Zealand, raising global alarm.4–6 The study entitled “A case series of invasive (iGAS) and non-invasive (non-iGAS) pediatric group A Streptococcal infections at a tertiary health care center: resurgence and concomitant viral infections” authored by Fields et al. statistically supports this premise.7 They performed a retrospective chart review and compared the GAS and iGAS cases between July 1, 2021, and June 30, 2023. They noted an increase in the incidence of GAS and iGAS infection during the post–COVID-19 period (July 1, 2022–June 30, 2023) as well as concomitant infection with influenza virus. The reasons for the emergence of GAS infections internationally are summarized as follows. Initially, this may be attributed to the confinement of children during the COVID-19 epidemic, resulting in heightened vulnerability to the pathogen—termed “immune debt.”6 The diminished exposure to GAS during the COVID-19 lockdown has resulted in insufficient immunity against GAS in certain children, hindering the natural development of immunity levels and resulting in a higher prevalence of susceptible youngsters. Moreover, initial GAS infection may be readily confused with SARS-CoV-2 Omicron infection by both parents and health care professionals, as it presents with pharyngitis-like symptoms (fever and sore throat), thus delaying the initiation of proper antibiotic therapy.8 Secondly, alterations in the bacterial genome and virulence may render GAS more susceptible, exemplified by the rise in GAS infections in 2014, which coincided with an increase in iGAS infections and the introduction of significant virulent GAS lineages.9 Infections caused by iGAS typically continue to advance, necessitating timely treatment interventions to reduce morbidity and death in affected individuals. Various virulence factors are associated with the complex mechanisms of GAS infection. The synthesis of exotoxins and certain surface proteins, including M-proteins encoded by the emm gene, is linked to significant virulence factors of GAS.10 The emm genotyping establishes the basis for identifying outbreaks and the severity of diseases caused by GAS. Certain emm strains, particularly emm1, have been linked to iGAS cases, including necrotizing fasciitis and STSS, exhibiting exacerbated clinical symptoms. Additionally, GAS is linked to many virulence factors known as superantigens (T-cell superantigens), some of which reside on chromosomes, whereas others are associated with prophages, perhaps contributing to SSTS.10 In 2011, an unforeseen increase in the occurrence of scarlet fever was documented in mainland China and Hong Kong.11 A prophage including superantigens (SSA and SpeC) and DNase (Spd1) in a macrolide-resistant emm12 strain was identified as a significant outbreak isolate of scarlet fever in these areas. Similarly, a superantigen overexpressing emm1 strain known as M1UK, recognized as an outbreak strain in England in 2016, is presently proliferating across European nations and parts of North America, Australia, New Zealand, Canada, and Taiwan.12,13 Prophage carrying superantigens were identified in 26% of the M1UK lineage scarlet fever isolates in Australia, further indicating that mobile genetic elements are a significant risk factor for future increases in GAS infections.14 Infection with iGAS correlates with the cotransmission of several winter viruses, including respiratory syncytial virus and influenza, as infection with one pathogen may elevate the susceptibility to a secondary disease, facilitating the entry of GAS by compromising the respiratory barrier. The severity of respiratory infections markedly escalates during concurrent bacterial infections or subsequent to viral infections (secondary infections).15 The predominant cause of severe and fatal bronchopneumonia is secondary influenza A infection with Streptococcus pneumoniae or GAS, and both influenza A and B viruses are linked to an elevated risk of severe GAS infection.16 There are unresolved enigmas in the control of GAS infections. Use of rapid antigen test for bedside diagnosis of GAS and early initiation of antibiotics can alleviate clinical symptoms, reduce transmission, and avoid complications. Although GAS remains susceptible to β-lactam antibiotics, failures in clinical settings have been recorded throughout decades, for reasons that remain inadequately understood. Recent reports of reduced penicillin susceptibility in GAS due to PBP mutation are concerning.17 Clinicians must remain vigilant regarding the potential rise in invasive cases, maintain a high index of suspicion for pertinent patients, and offer suitable safety recommendations, as the prompt identification of individuals infected with iGAS and the timely initiation of targeted and supportive treatment can be lifesaving. Notwithstanding the challenges, there is optimism that an efficacious GAS vaccine will be available in the near future.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.010
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.132
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.010
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.452
Teacher spread0.421 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInfectious Diseases in Clinical PracticeSame topicStreptococcal Infections and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207