MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Third-Mode Compressibility Analysis for  Microstrip-Fed Planar Monopole Antennas

2025· article· en· W4413964236 on OpenAlexaff
Muhammad Zaka Ali, Ismail Ben Mabrouk

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAntenna Design and Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec en Abitibi-Témiscamingue
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPlanarMagnetic monopoleMode (computer interface)MicrostripCompressibilityAcousticsMicrostrip antennaPhysicsMaterials scienceTelecommunicationsComputer scienceOpticsMechanicsAntenna (radio)Quantum mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper introduces the first investigation of compressibility in third higher-order mode (HOM) planar monopole antennas (PMAs) fed by a microstrip line. Eight compression configurations, defined by the compressed or uncompressed states of three current sections in the third mode, are investigated. By selectively compressing these sections and optimizing compression ratios, two antenna designs are developed: one offering high directivity (>5.2 dBi) and the other providing a wide beamwidth (>110°) with omnidirectional radiation. Compared to existing third-HOM planar dipole antenna (PDA) designs, the proposed PMAs achieve up to 87% size reduction while nearly doubling the fractional bandwidth. Full-wave simulations and experimental results closely match theoretical predictions, validating the effectiveness and feasibility of the proposed approach.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.259
Teacher spread0.246 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAntenna Design and Analysis→French-language works237,207→