MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Comment on egusphere-2025-2851

2025· peer-review· en· W4413965084 on OpenAlexaffabout

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepeer-review
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicArctic and Russian Policy Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of CalgaryUniversity of Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract. Landfast sea ice is a crucial component of the Arctic ecosystem and holds significant cultural importance for indigenous communities in the Canadian Arctic. They rely on it for hunting, navigation, and maintaining connections between communities. As a climate indicator, landfast sea ice plays a key role in heat exchange between the ocean and the atmosphere, serves as a buffer against storms and coastal erosion, and impacts local environmental stability. However, the Arctic is experiencing rapid warming, which is leading to a reduction in the extent, thickness, and strength of sea ice. This trend increases the vulnerability of communities dependent on landfast ice to severe environmental events. This study focuses on the community of Tuktoyaktuk in the Northwest Territories, Canada, where landfast sea ice has been observed to fracture more frequently in the winter season. Using satellite-based Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) and meteorological data, this research identifies that changing wind directions, particularly strong western and north-western winds, are significant factors contributing to the displacement of ice from the shore. Observations reveal a growing frequency of ice fracture events from 3 to 13 fracture counts from 2016–2017 to 2022–2023, coinciding with an increase in the occurrence of strong winds along the Tuktoyaktuk coast. The study aims to assess the likelihood of landfast sea ice fracturing under specific wind conditions, providing insights into the impact of climatic changes on the stability of ice in this region.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.010
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: Commentary
Teacher disagreement score0.710
Threshold uncertainty score0.969

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.010
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.003
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0220.011
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.2900.169

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.065
GPT teacher head0.401
Teacher spread0.336 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreCommentary

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicArctic and Russian Policy Studies→French-language works237,207→