MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4413967085 · doi:10.1109/jssc.2025.3601571

A Blocker-Tolerant Receiver With VCO-Based Non-Uniform Multi-Level Time-Approximation Filter

2025· article· en· W4413967085 on OpenAlexaff
Ce Yang, Shiyu Su, Mostafa Ayesh, Soumya Mahapatra, Vinay Chenna, Hossein Hashemi, Mike Shuo‐Wei Chen

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Adaptive Filtering Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsVoltage-controlled oscillatorFilter (signal processing)Computer scienceElectrical engineeringEngineeringVoltageComputer vision

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A blocker-tolerant millimeter-wave (mm-Wave) receiver is presented using a multi-level time-approximation filter (mTAF), a voltage-controlled oscillator (VCO)-based integrator with embedded digitization, and non-uniform (NU) sampling to enhance filtering flexibility and efficiency. The mTAF approximates FIR filter responses using a digitally generated multi-level weighting pattern that controls gated integration over time. Compared with state-of-the-art reconfigurable blocker-tolerant receivers, the seven-level mTAF introduces more programmable notches, enables asymmetric filtering, and provides wider stopbands for improved blocker suppression. The VCO-based integrator simplifies circuit complexity and achieves competitive power efficiency compared with conventional Gm-C designs, while NU sampling further mitigates alias-band blockers. Fabricated in 28-nm CMOS, the prototype occupies 0.83 mm2and consumes 87 mW. The receiver achieves 65-dB maximum blocker rejection, −36-dB EVM without blockers, and −31-dB EVM with a 24-dBc blocker at 1.217-GHz offset from a 32-GHz LO.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.259
Teacher spread0.237 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Journal of Solid-State CircuitsSame topicAdvanced Adaptive Filtering TechniquesFrench-language works237,207