MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4413970614 · doi:10.1002/cph4.70038

The Role of Mesenchymal Stromal Cells in the Treatment of Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia: A Multi‐Prong Approach for a Heterogeneous Disease

2025· article· en· W4413970614 on OpenAlexafffund
Marc‐Olivier Deguise, Bernard Thébaud

Bibliographic record

VenueComprehensive physiology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicNeonatal Respiratory Health Research
Canadian institutionsOttawa HospitalChildren's Hospital of Eastern OntarioUniversity of Ottawa
FundersChildren's Hospital of Eastern Ontario Foundation
KeywordsMesenchymal stem cellBronchopulmonary dysplasiaDiseaseStromal cellCancer researchMedicinePathologyChemistryBiologyGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Acute lung injury can be a devastating ailment leading to death in patients of all ages. In preterm neonates, lung injury is unique and unlike what is seen in pediatric and adult populations. The physiology behind the acute lung injury endured in developing lungs and the chronicity of harmful stimuli vastly distinguish how bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD), the most common complication of prematurity, settles in as a chronic lung disease with lifetime sequelae. Despite being recognized for over 50 years, BPD continues to puzzle the world of neonatology with a shifting phenotype that parallels improvement in neonatal care. The improved understanding of BPD's far-reaching and long-term consequences on the lung and other organs highlights the need to find effective interventions, making it a priority of neonatal research. In this review, we provide an overview of BPD and its associated consequences. Then, we examine the biological premises for mesenchymal stromal cells as a promising therapy, reviewing current translational efforts, challenges, and future directions toward bringing mesenchymal stromal cell therapy to BPD patients.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.727
Threshold uncertainty score0.385

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.041
GPT teacher head0.354
Teacher spread0.313 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueComprehensive physiologySame topicNeonatal Respiratory Health ResearchFrench-language works237,207