Prognostic Value of Dynamic Lactate Dehydrogenase Trends in Immunotherapy for Advanced Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: Retrospective Cohort Study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have emerged as a pivotal treatment for advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). However, their efficacy can significantly differ among patients, highlighting the need for reliable prognostic markers to enhance treatment outcomes. Lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) plays a key regulatory role in the complex relationship between cancer metabolism and the immune system, suggesting that monitoring LDH levels may provide valuable insights into treatment efficacy and inform personalized therapeutic strategies for advanced ESCC. Objective: This study aimed to explore the prognostic significance of dynamic changes in LDH levels during ICI therapy in predicting treatment outcomes. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of 126 patients with advanced ESCC who received first-line ICI therapy at the Department of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Center, Shandong Provincial Hospital, between April 2018 and November 2022. Serum LDH levels were measured after every 3 cycles of combined immunotherapy and chemotherapy. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis determined the optimal LDH reduction threshold. Kaplan-Meier survival curves and Cox regression models assessed progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival. Results: Among the 126 patients, 55 (43.6%) were classified into the LDH-increased group, while 71 (56.4%) belonged to the LDH-decreased group. Within the LDH-increased group, 78.2% (43/55) of the patients were male, compared to 90.1% (64/71) in the LDH-decreased group. The median age of patients in the LDH-increased group was 59 (range 55-68) years, whereas the median age in the LDH-decreased group was 65 (range 58-65) years. LDH decrease following first-line ICI therapy was associated with improved outcomes compared to LDH increases (median PFS 13.4, IQR 8.1-24.3 mo vs median 10.8, IQR 4.8-20.6 mo; P= .03). Patients with a posttreatment LDH decrease of more than 14.4% had a median PFS of 11.1 (IQR 7.2-24.3) months, whereas those with an LDH decrease between 0% and 14.4% had a median PFS of 21.7 (IQR 9.4-34.5) months. Conversely, an increase in LDH resulted in a median PFS of 10.8 (IQR 4.8-20.6) months. Patients with tumor reduction exhibited a significantly greater decrease in LDH levels compared with those without tumor reduction (P<.001). Multivariate analysis identified LDH decrease as an independent predictor of a 41% lower mortality risk (hazard ratio 0.59, 95% CI 0.36-0.96; P=.04). Conclusions: In patients with advanced ESCC, a decrease in serum LDH levels ranging from 0% to 14.4% after treatment initiation was significantly associated with prolonged PFS. Notably, an early decrease in LDH levels observed after 3 cycles of immunotherapy further correlated with improved clinical outcomes. These results highlight the potential of LDH as a valuable biomarker for risk stratification and personalized treatment optimization in advanced ESCC.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".