MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4413975908 · doi:10.1556/2054.2025.00460

Exploring barriers and opportunities for Black, Indigenous, and People of Color (BIPOC) therapists in psychedelic-assisted therapy: A qualitative study

2025· article· en· W4413975908 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Psychedelic Studies · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicPsychedelics and Drug Studies
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIndigenousQualitative researchPsychotherapistPsychologyPeople of colorMedicineMedical educationSociologyGender studiesSocial scienceRace (biology)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background and aims Psychedelic-assisted therapies (PAT) have emerged as promising treatments for mental health conditions such as depression, anxiety, and trauma-related disorders. However, the underrepresentation of Black, Indigenous, and People of Color (BIPOC) in PAT research and clinical practice limits equitable access and the generalizability of outcomes. This study explored the perspectives of BIPOC therapists on opportunities and barriers to engaging in PAT, with the aim of identifying strategies to foster inclusivity and equity in the field. Methods Using a qualitative design, we conducted semi-structured interviews and focus groups with 18 licensed therapists and healthcare professionals identifying as BIPOC. Data collection explored participants' experiences with PAT, perceived barriers and opportunities, and perspectives on cultural diversity within the field. Template analysis was conducted on transcribed audio recordings. Results Key ‘Opportunities’ themes included the potential for BIPOC therapists to enhance diversity in PAT, foster safety and trust for clients of color, and provide culturally attuned care to address trauma rooted in systemic oppression. Participants identified ‘Barriers’ such as financial and geographic inaccessibility of training, exclusionary training environments, stigma associated with psychedelics, and the extractive nature of current Western therapeutic models. To address these challenges, participants recommended culturally responsive training programs, mentorship opportunities, financial support, and community education to reduce stigma and increase engagement. Most participants identified as African American/Black, which may limit transferability of findings to other BIPOC groups. Conclusion This study underscores the critical role of BIPOC therapists in advancing equity and cultural responsiveness in PAT and highlights the need for intentional efforts to create equitable, culturally informed models of care.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.064
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.425
GPT teacher head0.482
Teacher spread0.057 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it