MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Optimization of VLC Link Performance using Commercial High-Power LEDs and Photodiodes

2025· article· en· W4413979126 on OpenAlexaff
Rajat Paliwal, Piyush N. Patel, Ahmad Atieh

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSemiconductor Lasers and Optical Devices
Canadian institutionsOptiwave Systems (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhotodiodeLight-emitting diodeVisible light communicationComputer sciencePower (physics)LED lampOptoelectronicsPhysicsOptics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The effect of the parameters of high-power commercial Phosphorus Light Emitting Diodes (PLEDs) of different correlated color temperature (CCTs) and photodiodes on optimizing the Visible light communication (VLC) system using OOK-NRZ modulation technique has been presented in this paper. The performance of a Line of Sight (LoS) VLC link is investigated using LEDs of different CCTs, including 2200 K, 3000 K, and 5700 K and photodiode models S5107, S5973-01, and S7686. The results showed that CCTs of 3000 K and 5700 K LEDs outperform with photodiode S5107, supporting a maximum data rate of 200 Mbps for a distance of 11 m. These performances are reduced to 160 Mbps for CCT of 2200 K. The LEDs with lower CCT values have fewer yellow spectral components, directly impacting the data rate. The photodiode S5107 parameters, including high responsivity, large photosensitive area and broad spectral range, play a key role in the best performance. The performance of S7686 is slightly better than that of S5973-01 photodiode with all LEDs due to a comparatively larger detection area. The performance of LEDs with CCT 3000K & 5700 K with photodiode S7686 supports a maximum data rate of 200 Mbps for 1 m, which is increased to 2m for the same data rate with CCT 2200 K. The performance of LEDs with CCT of 3000 K and 5700 K with photodiode S5973-01 have the worst performance due to lowest photosensitive area of 12 x 10<sup xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">-4</sup> cm<sup xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">2</sup>, ends up supporting data rate of only 80 Mbps for 1 m which it is increased to 2m for the same data rate considering CCT 2200 K. The logarithm of the bit-error-ratio (BER) metric is used to characterize the VLC system performance.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.032
Threshold uncertainty score0.227

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.213
Teacher spread0.205 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicSemiconductor Lasers and Optical DevicesFrench-language works237,207