MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4413979917 · doi:10.1109/taslpro.2025.3606235

Exploring Cross-Utterance Speech Contexts for Conformer-Transducer Speech Recognition Systems

2025· article· en· W4413979917 on OpenAlex
Mengzhe Geng, Jiajun Deng, Chengji Deng, Jiawen Kang, Shujie Hu, Guinan Li, Tianzi Wang, Zhaoqing Li, Xie Chen, Xunying Liu

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Audio Speech and Language Processing · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicSpeech Recognition and Synthesis
Canadian institutionsNational Research Council Canada
FundersNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsUtteranceSpeech recognitionComputer scienceSpeech processingNatural language processingArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper investigates four types of cross-utterance speech contexts modeling approaches for streaming and non-streaming Conformer-Transformer (C-T) ASR systems: i) input audio feature concatenation; ii) cross-utterance Encoder embeddings concatenation; iii) cross-utterance Encoder embeddings pooling projection; or iv) a novel chunk-based approach applied to C-T models for the first time. An efficient batch training scheme is proposed for contextual C-Ts that uses spliced speech utterances within each minibatch to minimize the synchronization overhead while preserving the sequential order of cross-utterance speech contexts. Experiments are conducted on four benchmark speech datasets across three languages: the English GigaSpeech and Mandarin Wenetspeech corpora used in contextual C-T models pre-training; and the English DementiaBank Pitt and Cantonese JCCOCC MoCA elderly speech datasets used in domain fine-tuning. The best performing contextual C-T systems consistently outperform their respective baselines using no cross-utterance speech contexts in pre-training and fine-tuning stages with statistically significant average word error rate (WER) or character error rate (CER) reductions up to <bold xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">0.9%</b>, <bold xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">1.1%</b>, <bold xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">0.51%</b>, and <bold xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">0.98%</b> absolute (<bold xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">6.0%</b>, <bold xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">5.4%</b>, <bold xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">2.0%</b>, and <bold xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">3.4%</b> relative) on the four tasks respectively. Their performance competitiveness against Wav2vec2.0-Conformer, XLSR-128, and Whisper models highlights the potential benefit of incorporating cross-utterance speech contexts into current speech foundation models.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.991
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.052
GPT teacher head0.299
Teacher spread0.247 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it