MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4413981496 · doi:10.3138/jh-2024-0024

Desert Locust and Rural Livelihood Insecurities in Northeast Shewa, Ethiopia, 1900–1991

2025· article· en· W4413981496 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Emishaw Workie Desta

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of History · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicAgriculture and Rural Development Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDesert locustDesert (philosophy)LivelihoodGeographyLocustSocioeconomicsAgroforestryForestrySchistocercaEcologyArchaeologyEnvironmental sciencePolitical scienceAgricultureBiologySociology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

It is apparent that the desert locust was and is one of the major challenges of human beings. This study attempts to investigate the impacts of desert locust infestation on the society and natural environment in Northeast Shewa, 1900–1991. The finding of this study reveals that this pest, in combination with other human and natural forces, made impoverishment of the local society an enduring phenomenon. Desert locusts that originated in the hot lowlands within and outside the country migrated deep into the hinterlands of Ethiopia, of which my study area was a part, following the direction of the wind. It damaged crops, grasses, and green leaves along the way. It caused the decline of productivity and intensified competition over resources that gradually ended up with conflicts, displacement, and death, particularly among the sedentary agriculturalists and pastoralists. It also caused starvation and famine. Environmentally, desert locust infestation disturbed the food web in particular and the balance in the ecosystem in general. The impact of the pest has been serious, with the progressive decline of vegetation cover and the associated climate change in the region, particularly since the post-liberation period.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.041
Threshold uncertainty score0.081

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.215
Teacher spread0.203 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of HistorySame topicAgriculture and Rural Development ResearchFrench-language works237,207