Quantum-Enhanced Dual-Backbone Architecture for Accurate Gastrointestinal Disease Detection Using Endoscopic Imaging
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background: Quantum machine learning (QML) holds significant promise for advancing medical image classification. However, its practical application to large-scale, high-resolution datasets is constrained by the limited number of qubits and the inherent noise in current quantum hardware. Methods: In this study, we propose the Fused Quantum Dual-Backbone Network (FQDN), a novel hybrid architecture that integrates classical convolutional neural networks (CNNs) with quantum circuits. This design is optimized for the noisy intermediate-scale quantum (NISQ), enabling efficient computation despite hardware limitations. We evaluate FQDN on the task of gastrointestinal (GI) disease classification using wireless capsule endoscopy (WCE) images. Results: The proposed model achieves a substantial reduction in parameter complexity, with a 29.04% decrease in total parameters and a 94.44% reduction in trainable parameters, while outperforming its classical counterpart. FQDN achieves an accuracy of 95.80% on the validation set and 95.42% on the test set. Conclusions: These results demonstrate the potential of QML to enhance diagnostic accuracy in medical imaging.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it