MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4413984047 · doi:10.1016/j.jcoa.2025.100250

Liquid chromatography coupled to mass spectrometry for steroid hormones analysis: issues and solutions in sample preparation and method development

2025· article· en· W4413984047 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Chromatography Open · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHormonal and reproductive studies
Canadian institutionsCanAm Bioresearch (Canada)
FundersRussian Science FoundationNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsChromatographySteroidMass spectrometrySample (material)ChemistryHormoneSample preparationLiquid chromatography–mass spectrometryBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Current work presents main aspects of the application of liquid chromatography in combination with low- and high-resolution mass spectrometry to an analysis of steroid hormones. Advantages and challenges of both targeted and untargeted analysis are shown together with the most popular approaches to the associated sample preparation. Among emerging approaches, first applications of isotope ratio mass spectrometry in combination with liquid chromatography for the analysis of steroid hormones for doping control purposes are presented and discussed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.366
Threshold uncertainty score0.548

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.365
Teacher spread0.338 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it