La théorie de Elizabeth Ann Manhart Barrett sur le pouvoir comme participation consciente au changement
Bibliographic record
Abstract
L’objectif de cet article est de présenter la théorie du pouvoir comme participation consciente au changement, développée par Elizabeth Ann Manhart Barrett. Cette théorie est inspirée du modèle de l’être humain unitaire de Martha Rogers, qui voit les individus comme des systèmes ouverts, intégrés à leur environnement, en constante interaction et évolution. Pour Barrett, le pouvoir est la capacité de participer de manière consciente et intentionnelle aux processus de changement, se manifestant par la conscience des possibilités et des choix, la capacité de prendre des décisions éclairées, la liberté d’agir et l’implication active dans les transformations. La théorie du pouvoir de Barrett est utilisée dans la recherche et la pratique infirmière, offrant un cadre pour promouvoir le pouvoir personnel et professionnel, et encourager une participation plus active et consciente aux changements dans divers contextes de soins de santé.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.012 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".